DianeG5385
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:06 PM
Original message |
Anyone think Bush wants to be rid of the Neocons? |
|
Two weeks ago he lauded Fitzgerald's investigation and today he called the investigation "serious". Could it be he wants to distance himself from the bunch of them? Daddy's advice?
|
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Then why does he keep promoting them? |
WritingIsMyReligion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I was going to say.. How would * know to get rid of them? |
|
But if Daddy says so, then we all must venerate the King!
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
3. He is just as guilty as they are....and he does not like changing the |
MissMarple
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
4. He'll have to have surgery, they are joined at the hip. |
Bob3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
5. no - he's not that bright. |
|
On the other hand he would sell his mother to a brothel in Thailand if it meant he could keep power. So expect stunning displays of dis-loyalty from him who after all only demanded complete loyalty from everybody else but for * loyalty is not a two way street.
|
triguy46
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
6. The question presumes * is capable of complex thought. n/t |
endarkenment
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He never admits mistakes and never changes course. God, or so he claims, guides his actions. This fuckwad has no clue, no ethics, no morality. Sociopath-in-chief.
|
Neocondriac
(732 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Kind of like Kermit getting rid of Jim Henson.
|
petgoat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Interesting Idea. My take was: the neocons wanted to be free of Bush! n/t |
katty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Too late for littleboybush-too late |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
11. He's one of them, whether he thinks he is or not. |
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Setting up the Ronald Reagan defense |
|
Yeah... bush seems to be trying to set the premise that he "didn't know" or was "out of the loop". Too bad he can't attribute his dimwittedness on alzheimers. Sorry Georgie... it ain't gonna work... the blame is gonna stick on you too. The truth is funny that way.
|
patricia92243
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
13. He has NEVER liked them. They worship him, but the feeling is not mutual. |
|
I think that he, personally, would get rid of them in a minute. But the Republican Party needs them, so he will keep stringing them along.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Have neocons ever, ever been right? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |