Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How is Bush going to be able to debate against our nominee?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:10 PM
Original message
How is Bush going to be able to debate against our nominee?
Seriously, I don't think the best prep team money can buy could help this guy against any of the nine dems. All of them actaully understand the words that they are speaking, don't say uh uh ummm, and don't have to look down at the paper and pause for several seconds to figure out how to pronounce big words. I think he'd almost be better off having Chenney do the debates for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. They know lots of words, too. Dozens of them
They all seem to know how to string them together in a coherent sentence, too. Seems to me that Bush will try to get out of a real debate, but of course, if he refuses that's a big one for our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. His only hope is to find a way out of them
and that is kind of scary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The media will just say the Chimp won. he beat expectations again.
No one who watched the debate could have thought Arnie won. No one who watched the debates between Gore and Chimp could say Chimpy won. But the media always says Bush beats expectations again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlBallard Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well
But now that he's the president, are the media really going to say "Seeing as how he didn't pee his pants, Bush wins!" this time? I mean really can they frame the debate as the sitting president is awful, but not as much so as we thought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. He will be much too busy doing important president stuff to have time
for debates. Would love to debate, really, but this leader of the free world takes a lot of time...</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. ...leader of the free world takes a lot of time for vacation, that is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalashnikov Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. itll be like all other debates
he easily earn a passing grade by memorizing canned answers to common questions he knows the moderator will ask. He would only fail if there were a moderator with some balls who would ask tough, original, and penetrating questions instead of rehashed junk that the candidate has been responding to for months on the campaign trail. Of course that won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Terror."
"Terror. September 11th. Terror. Terror. Evil. Terror. Cuba. Terror. Terror. Faith-based initiative. Terror. Terror. Terror. September 11th. Terror. Terror. Do-Not-Call. Terror. Terror. Terror. Terror. Liberal. Terror. Terror. Madman. Dictator. Terror. Terror. Dot com bubble. Terror. Terror. Terror."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlBallard Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And
Terror

Just stealing some of your funny :).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You forgot "sex slaves" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Aw man, you forgot axis of evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbes159 Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Look at what he does now....
Dodge the question, give answer to completely unrelated subject and keep repeating the same lines over and over again. All we need is a moderator or a debate format that allows the Dem candidate to say: "Sorry, George, you didn't answer the question. Want to try again?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E_Zapata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. He doesn't have to debate, and he won't. Arnie was the test subj for that
I believe that.

They needed to see if the electorate would trounce any candidate unwilling to speak about his record, beliefs, policy ideas. Et voila, no problem. The sheeple are perfectly willing to accept a candidate saying they 'don't have time' and keep the votes rolling in for that candidate.

Because, in essence, the american electorate doesn't really want to hear the TRUTH about a candidate's idiocy. The media spin is perfect. They throw their votes behind the candidate most likely to not make them think about reality. Why, it's better than crappy TV for numbing the mind. Wah hoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalashnikov Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I wouldnt be so cynical
about arnies election. 70% of california hated Davis (for better or worse) and desperately wanted someone to replace him; unfortunately the two serious candidates bustamante and Mcclintock were too far out on the political spectrum to appeal to the centrist voters. Thus they voted for the only percieved centrist: Arnie. He was not seen as a radical Repub (Mcclintock) or a far left Dem (Bustam.) in the pocket of Indian tribes and the Latino vote. The voters put ino ffice someone, who because he was so silent on the issues, allowed them to apply whatever label they wanted to him. If there was another well known centrist in the campaign I believe they would have beaten Arnie.
People wanted Davis' moderate positions without Davis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. participating in the debates will only weaken our resolve..
Edited on Fri Oct-10-03 11:45 PM by arcane1
and interfere with the war on terra, giving hope and encouragement to our enemies

only someone with no regard whatsoever to the safety of the Murkan people would suggest that the president distract himself with petty partisan bickering

the Murkan people want more than that


:hopefully obvious sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt Remarque Donating Member (709 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. very low expectations...
as long as he can complete a sentence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. His negotiating team will play hardball
They won't want a townhall meeting format. They will insist on the debate being moderated by Brit Hume or Rita Cosby. They will also try for the "Meet the Press" format of the 2nd debate in the 2000, which tends to facilitate chit-chatting, but no real debating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. gore mopped the floor with him...
and the media said bush won.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I saw a poll the other day, somewhere online...
that said that the majority of people who watched the debates thought that Gore won, but the majority of people who watched the news reports about the debates thought that Bush won

thanks to bullshit biased 'librul' media coverage :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. People have said Bush will duck the debates
in every race he's ever run.

There's no way he'd debate Anne Richard. She'll chew him up like yesterday's chaw.

He's not going to debate Gary Mauro. He's got nothing to gain by it.

Al Gore is the best debator in America. Wait till he gets Shrub in the same room.

Every election it's the same thing.

Bush won't debate. Then the negotiations start and he ends up getting most of what he wants.

He debates. Does almost decent and gets declared the winner because he did better than everyone expected, meaning he didn't vomit on himself dueing the debate.

If he debated against Anne Richards and Al Gore why would anyone think he wouldn't debate this time. It seems to go against all evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. There won't be a debate.
If all else fails, there will be an extremely fortuitously timed national emergency (I don't want to say terrorist attack) precipitating the regrettable but necessary cancellation of the event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Damned if he does; damned if he doesn't...
no winning scenario for bush.

If he goes into a debate, he'll get crushed.

If he avoids a debate, he'll get more than crushed, he'd be obliterared.

The only thing Schwartzesatan did was set a precedent for short term elections. No one in this country, except for the bushies, would accept 'no debates' as an answer. These clods are arrogant, but even they know that would dissolve any support they have left.

Regardless of who our nominee is, I will be taping these debates for my grandchildren. Nothing like a great comedy on a stormy night!

:bounce: I can't wait!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
23. Same way as last time
As long as he doesn't wugga-wugga the camera or moon the audience, he will have been considered to have won the debate. Heck he probably could do that and get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. They will simply revert to the soft biggotry of low expectations
When Bush gets up and doesn't babble incoherently, the GOP and the media will declare him the winner and they will tacitly admit that they are declaring him the winner not because he out debated his rival but because he didn't do as badly as expected. They public will lap it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC