Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems blast White House on leak probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:32 AM
Original message
Dems blast White House on leak probe
Dems blast White House on leak probe

Senators reiterate call for special prosecutor to investigate

Thursday, October 9, 2003 Posted: 6:22 PM EDT (2222 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Four leading Democratic senators accused the White House on Thursday of bungling a probe into the leak of an undercover CIA officer's name in what the outed operative's husband calls an attempt at political intimidation.

In a letter to President Bush, Minority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota and three others said the White House has made "at least five serious missteps" in the leak probe so far.

The biggest is leaving Attorney General John Ashcroft in charge of the probe rather than naming a special prosecutor to handle it, as they have called for previously, they said.

"We are at risk of seeing this investigation so compromised that those responsible for this national security breach will never be identified and prosecuted," the senators wrote.

The letter was signed by Sens. Joseph Biden of Delaware, ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; Carl Levin of Michigan, ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee; and Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, one of the first lawmakers to call for an investigation of the leak.

There was no immediate reaction from the White House or the Justice Department.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/09/leak.main/index.html

--------------------------------

- Once again we see a Bush* scandal being systematically covered up by the most corrupt WH in history. Some Dems are keeping up the pressure...but they could use more help from the PARTY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just "stonewall" it...eventually it will go away..
Some other story will take its place. These secretive bastards think the government belongs to them personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hate to be a cynic
OK, I don't really, but I get the nagging feeling that the dems are now jumping all over this because they know it's the CIA's fight with the WH and that the CIA is going to keep up the pressure. Like kids in a schoolyard gathering to watch the two bullies fight each other, they've decided to egg it on knowing they're not going to get bloodied noses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. and your point is..?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. This has been out there since July
what did we hear in July? Crickets.

Now that Wilson and disgruntled CIA people are all over TV news programs blasting the WH three months later, the dems are only now jumping on the bandwagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. When opportunity knocks, don't say, "Who's there?"
Say, "Come on in!" :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. When opportunists knock
Opportunity rarely knocks on your door. Knock rather on opportunity's door if you ardently wish to enter. :)

B. C. Forbes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The Dems have asked for a Special Prosecutor...
...from the beginning. It should be obvious to anyone that the Bushies can't be trusted to investigate themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The CIA depends on funding from the Congress with WH cooperation
The CIA is not powerful enough to fight this alone, unless they resort to dirty tricks or worse, which could undermine their legitimacy completely. So the Dems need to join with them in the battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Not True.
The CIA has its own sources of funding. They have funded wars on their own. Do some research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. they need to make lots more noise about this....
With media in this misadministrations' pocket I am sure we won't see anything on the Sunday "news" shows. I expect the WH propaganda machine to be out in force telling us "once upon a time in the New Iraq" stories.... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. I find it interesting...
...that many Democrats have 'moved on' from this issue. GOPers constantly and successfully campaign on 'national security' issues and yet we allow these types of obvious failures to drop from the public view.

- Kennedy called the Iraq war a 'fraud'...and all we got was one big yawn from the Democratic party. Now the party has a chance to expose the Bush* WH on their double standards and lack of concern about national security...and here comes that yawn again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. That was dumb
"We are at risk of seeing this investigation so compromised that those responsible for this national security breach will never be identified and prosecuted," the senators wrote.

Just EXACTLY what they want to hear. Good! Everything going according to plan.

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. I would hardly call it a blast, but at least it's a start.
I bet it really heats up in the presidential campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The focus is about hiring a Special Prosecutor...
Edited on Sat Oct-11-03 08:55 AM by Q
...instead of having the WH and Ashcroft investigate themselves.

- The Repubicans would DEMAND a special prosecutor if the situation was reversed. In fact they DID...when the issues were far less important than national security. (see: whitewater).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. KEEP TRAITORGATE ALIVE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. MSNBC is doing a story on this right now...
...interviewing a Washington Post reporter. (Dana Priest)

- Talking about the damage done by the exposure of a 'deep cover' agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. I wrote to our local paper who has not printed it yet, but I will
continue to send it to them and to my congressmen the following:

President Bush says it is doubtful that the FELON(s) in the White House administration who outed a CIA operative, thus compromising her life, her work and her associations during more than 20 years, and our NATIONAL SECURITY, may never be found.

If he canot find a FELON(s) in his own administration, how on earth can he find Osama and Saddam?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. Leak of CIA Officers Leaves Trail of Damage
Edited on Sat Oct-11-03 10:04 AM by Q
Published on Saturday, October 11, 2003 by Knight-Ridder

Leak of CIA Officers Leaves Trail of Damage
by Warren P. Strobel

WASHINGTON - It's just a 12-letter name - Valerie Plame - but the leak by Bush administration officials of that CIA officer's identity may have damaged U.S. national security to a much greater extent than generally realized, current and former agency officials say. Plame, the wife of former ambassador and Bush critic Joseph Wilson, was a member of a small elite-within-an-elite, a CIA employee operating under "nonofficial cover," in her case as an energy analyst, with little or no protection from the U.S. government if she got caught.
Department official

Training agents such as Plame, 40, costs millions of dollars and requires the time-consuming establishment of elaborate fictions, called "legends," including in this case the creation of a CIA front company that helped lend plausibility to her trips overseas. Compounding the damage, the front company, Brewster-Jennings & Associates, whose name has been reported previously, apparently also was used by other CIA officers whose work now could be at risk, according to Vince Cannistraro, formerly the agency's chief of counterterrorism operations and analysis.

Now, Plame's career as a covert operations officer in the CIA's Directorate of Operations is over. Those she dealt with - whether on business or not - may be in danger. The DO is conducting an extensive damage assessment.

And Plame's exposure may make it harder for American spies to convince foreigners to share important secrets with them, U.S. intelligence officials said.

Bush partisans tend to downplay the leak's damage, saying Plame's true job was widely known in Washington, if unspoken. And, they say, she had moved from the DO, the CIA's covert arm, to an analysis job. But intelligence professionals, infuriated over the breach and what they see as the Bush administration's misuse of intelligence on Iraq, vehemently disagree.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/1011-01.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC