Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army chaplain gets 5 years for forcible sodomy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 08:05 AM
Original message
Army chaplain gets 5 years for forcible sodomy
http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-sod02.html

BAMBERG, Germany -- A U.S. Army chaplain was sentenced Tuesday to five years in prison after pleading guilty at his court-martial to three counts of forcible sodomy against enlisted men.

Capt. Gregory Arflack, 44, a Roman Catholic priest serving as a chaplain with the 279th Base Support Battalion, also pleaded guilty to three counts of committing an indecent act, two counts of fraternization with enlisted service members and one count of conduct unbecoming an officer.

The court-martial took place in Bamberg, Germany, where Arflack's unit is based.

'I messed it up'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Midwest_Doc Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why is this news-worthy (surprising)? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because if I had a kid thinking about joining up I would want him/her...
...to be aware that this kind of stuff goes on in the army.

Wouldn't you?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Was the "forcible"
part actually physical force, of because of the rank difference?

I didn't get a chance to read the link carefully.

It's an interesting case, given the ages of the victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The article said they were drunk and passed out n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He deserves a long sentence, then
that is as low as it gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. But if he had done it to middle-eastern teenage boys
the Repukes would have given him a medal . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just curious, why is it "forcible sodomy" and not "rape"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Because sodomy is worse, obviously.
Edited on Wed Nov-02-05 09:46 AM by C_eh_N_eh_D_eh
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Because "Sodomy" implies anal rape without them having to
actually say it. The Military's definition if sodomy also includes oral sex, which is what they use as a catch-all for anyone that gets caught having sex far outside of their ranks. In actuality, probably 99% of the military should be in the brig if they truly enforced it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC