Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fraud in intelligence on Iraq mounting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 07:36 PM
Original message
Fraud in intelligence on Iraq mounting
http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/mld/sunnews/news/opinion/13156507.htm

Who in the White House knew about DITSUM No. 044-02, and when did they know it? That's the newly declassified smoking-gun document, originally prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency in February 2002 but ignored by President Bush. Its declassification last weekend blows another huge hole in Bush's claim that he was acting on the best intelligence available when he pitched the invasion of Iraq as a way to prevent an al-Qaida terrorist attack using weapons of mass destruction. The report demolished the credibility of the key al-Qaida informant the administration relied on to make its claim that a working alliance existed between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.

Al-Qaida senior military trainer Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi - a Libyan captured in Pakistan in 2001 - probably was "intentionally misleading the debriefers," the DIA report concluded in one of two paragraphs finally declassified at the request of Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich. The report also said: "Ibn al-Shaykh has been undergoing debriefs for several weeks and may be describing scenarios to the debriefers that he knows will retain their interest."

He got that right. Folks in the highest places were very interested in claims along the lines al-Libi was peddling, even though they went against both logic and the preponderance of intelligence gathered to that point about possible collaboration between two enemies of the U.S. that were fundamentally at odds with each other. Al-Qaida was able to create a base in Iraq only after the U.S. overthrow of Saddam, not before.

Yet Bush used the informant's already discredited tall tale in his key Oct. 7, 2002, speech just before the Senate voted on whether to authorize the use of force in Iraq and again in two speeches in February, just ahead of the invasion. Leading up to the war, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell tried to sell it to the United Nations, while Vice President Dick Cheney, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer and Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith repeated it for homeland audiences. The con worked, and Americans came to believe the lie that Saddam was associated with the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers.

In fact, al-Libi, according to the DIA, could not name any Iraqis involved, any chemical or biological material used or where the training allegedly occurred. In January 2004, the prisoner recanted his story, and the next month the CIA withdrew all intelligence reports based on his false information.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. The general tone of the media...
has certainly changed in the past few weeks. they are toast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think the bloggers are kicking the media's ass and even Karl
reads them. The media would like to duck and cover but they can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC