The Whiskey Priest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:12 AM
Original message |
O’Reilly Should Be Worried |
|
It would be stretching credulity to believe that Al Qaeda would take targeting suggestions from O’Reilly. What I would be worried about if I were O’Reilly is that some nutcase like Tim McVeigh might take his suggestion on Coit Tower.
Words so matter and when someone takes to the air waves with the suggestion that someone should teach San Francisco a lesson because an election did go the way they thought it should, well that’s sort of yelling “fire” in the movie theater.
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. sorry but that's wishful thinking |
|
he would weasel out of it and blame it on the liberal left for doing it to make him look bad
and unfortunately, too many people would probably believe him
|
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:16 AM
Response to Original message |
2. There's a great O'Reilly quote in this video |
sam sarrha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:17 AM
Response to Original message |
3. that is more like sicking a rabid dog on a child |
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:18 AM
Response to Original message |
4. The right wing nuts need him and his lunatic fringe audience! As long |
|
as they are in power, anything that happens, won't be their fault! They've already laid the ground work for that.
|
shenmue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message |
|
And I mean that quite literally. O'Reilly is a deeply ignorant man. I only hope there isn't some apocalyptic militia drone waiting for his chance to 'prove' what he believes.
:scared:
:thumbsdown:
|
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message |
7. It's also the very definition of terrorism. |
lady raven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Thanks for saying that. Bill O' Reilly HAS committed an act of terrorism |
|
And probably treason as well.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Isn't inciting violence still a crime? |
|
This pretty much borders on it. Not to mention the violence from San Franciscans if he EVER shows up there.
|
upi402
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 02:08 AM
Response to Original message |
10. O'Reilly committed act of terrorism, treason too |
|
it would seem. Isn't that illegal as all hell? This is far worse than yelling "fire" in a theater.
|
lady raven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Sort of akin (though somehow even WORSE, if that's possible) to... |
|
* telling the insurgents to "bring it on".
Gee, thanks for the macho taunt, encouraging Iraqis to kill our Military people. Thanks very much.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 02:25 AM
Response to Original message |
greatauntoftriplets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
13. And I bet he isn't worried at all. |
|
As others said, even if it happened, he'd never in a million years take responsibility for it.
|
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Wingnuts would have "taught San Fran a lesson" long ago anyway |
|
I can't imagine this pushing anyone over the edge.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |