Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ken Mehlman is a LYING LIAR ---->>>

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:26 AM
Original message
Ken Mehlman is a LYING LIAR ---->>>
Edited on Mon Nov-14-05 11:35 AM by Stephanie

Josh Marshall catalogues some of the LIES told by Ken Mehlman on Sunday's Meet the Press. The video is available here: http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/11/13.html#a5844

Link to the MTP transcript: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9967566/




http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

<excerpt>

Let's catalog a few of <Mehlman's lies>.

One was that the Senate intel report exonerated the administration of any effort to mislead the American people over Iraq. Wrong. They specifically did not look at that question.

He also said the Silbermann/Robb Commission concluded the same thing. Wrong. They too were specifically not authorized to examine that question.

He said the British Butler Report said the same thing. First of all, who cares what a Report written to cover Tony Blair said? Second of all, it said no such thing.

He said the Duelfer Report said Saddam "was trying to reconstitute his weapons programs." That is at best a highly, highly misleading description of the report.

He said that Saddam "had supported terrrorists, had terrorists operating out of his country." There are so many different lies and canards potentially underlying this claim it's hard to know where to start. But again, wrong. None of the purported evidence for this claim has ever stood up.

This hurricane of lies scarcely covers all the false or misleading statements he made in just that one little video clip. So please take a look at the clip and send in any more examples you find of clearly false or intentionally misleading statements.

<more>

-- Josh Marshall











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. The pictures alone prove it
His mouth is open. He's a Republican. Ergo, he's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
afdip Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. it's his job . . . he's paid to lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. On the Special Skills section of his resume it says:
Lying. Prevaricating. Telling Whoppers. Exaggerating. Twisting Words. Taking Things Out of Context. Relating Tall Tales. Spinning Yarns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mr. Obvious is staring us in the face. The title of the essay is redundant
...thrice. Mehlman=Lying=Liar

Equally good title: "Lies all lies, and that Lying bastard lied about the lies he told about that other liar. What was his name? Oh yes. liar." or "Lies and the Liars who Lie for them"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. A Lying Liar Lies about the Lying Liars' Lies
Edited on Mon Nov-14-05 11:50 AM by Stephanie
Should I change it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Hell no its perfect.
:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. why the F*CK does the american media serve as mouthpiece...
...to lying asshats like Mehlman? They legitimize him by giving him a forum. Thankfully, I've boycotted television for over a decade, and I urge others to do the same. Let these rat bastards talk themselves blue into the empty aether. It won't matter if no one's listening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. After watching Little Kenny's dog-and-pony show,
and seeing Russert leave Mehlman's lies unchallenged for the most part, I realize that I have more contempt for this swine than even Scott McLellan. He is a lying pusbag of the first order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They have no choice but to tell more lies
They either have to continue lying or admit everything. There's no way around it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. what about the one
where Russet pressed him for an answer that 58% think the bush administration lied. Mehlman said "well I don't know the internals to that poll but" :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Actually he said he would fire the pollster...
when Russert came down with ALL those negatives in the poll. I think he thought he was being cute, but I thought he was NAILED! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. He DID say that - hysterical!
And check out the double-speak that follows:

RUSSERT: J.D. Hayworth in Arizona said he wouldn't want the president to campaign for him in Arizona. Anne Northup in Kentucky said it wouldn't be a--she hasn't decided right now, but wants to find out whether it would be a good idea. Friday in Pennsylvania, Rick Santorum stayed in another part of the state when the president went up to Wilkes-Barre. And look at these numbers. This is what the voters say. Preference for 2006 congressional candidates, Republican-controlled Congress, 37; Democrats, 48. Our congressional Republicans, "Do they have the same priorities as you for the country?" Same priorities, yes, 24; no, 58. "In which issues do you prefer the Democrats over the Republicans?" Environment, gas prices, health care, Social Security, education, reducing deficits, energy policy, economy, government spending, taxes, trade issues, foreign policy, abortion, immigration, ethics in government, and Iraq--16 of the 19 issues we presented to the people, they chose the Democrats. Your party's in trouble?

MR. MEHLMAN: Tim, usually, when I get a poll like that, I will fire the pollster. That's my response that I usually do to that. Look, in all seriousness, there's no question we're in difficult political times. And the question is fundamentally, do we have an agenda of change?

What the American people clearly want, in my judgment, is the same thing they wanted in 2004 and 2002, when we as the incumbents won, because we were seen as agents of change, and the Democrats were seen as agents of the status quo. What they want is change, and they want change because too often, the government hasn't served their needs. That's why we created a Patriot Act and a Department of Homeland Security, why we reformed education, why we reformed our tax laws and litigation rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Marshall says we will need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission post-Bush
Edited on Mon Nov-14-05 03:18 PM by confludemocrat
, I assume he means, if not immediately post-2006 elections. Truer words were never spoken lately. I have had that same thought many times during and since Fall 2002. And we also need a constitutional amendment that bans a president from issuing pardons to executive branch political appointees, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. YES YES YES YES YES uhm YES. Stop this corruption!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. I saw him on there. He is truly disgusting.
As far as I could tell, everything he said was either a lie or an already-refuted wingnut talking point. Except maybe that line about shooting his pollster - that's their "kill the messenger" approach to bad news.

What a load of crap his appearance was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC