Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember when people used to cite WP or NYT as a source when ridiculing...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 10:36 AM
Original message
Remember when people used to cite WP or NYT as a source when ridiculing...
Edited on Fri Nov-18-05 10:37 AM by NNN0LHI
...someone as a Tin Hat Conspiracy Theorist around here? I think those days are over. And not a moment too soon either. Had these Bush administration propagandists not been exposed I think there is a good chance Junior would have invaded Iran and/or Syria by now. With the medias help the sky was the limit for Bush and the neocons.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Although there is a down side to this.
Back when one could more or less rely on the WP or the NYT to at least cover both sides of an issue, we had something like a reliable independent press. We had a paper of record. Now what do we have? We have a blogosphere of dissonance and dissidence and a mass and print media hell bent on stenography or missing white women in aruba or the ideal mix of both. We now have the modern equivalent of the soviet era samizdat for providing information to people outside 'normal' channels and that has huge problems with trolls, tin foil hats, with reliability in general and with such volume, so many inputs, so many sources of distortion that it is frequently indistinguishable from noise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Tell me how finding out the real "tin foil hats" or worse...
...are in the media we once trusted is bad. I don't quite understand how that is bad. That is a gift. Bad would be not knowing. I can stand the truth.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm not sure it is bad.
Perhaps it is just disturbing that things have deteriorated so much within our society that 'journalism' is indistiguishable from babbling lunacy :-)

I'm actually trying to figure out if the current situation is worse and/or different than the consensus coldwar reality of the msm prior to the breakdown over vietnam. Maybe it isn't, but I don't quite remember thinking that EVERYTHING in the NYT was slanted bullshit of dubious veracity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I am with you here. It is disturbing as hell to me
I mean who likes to admit that they have been lied to on purpose by our most trusted news organizations all of these years? I sure don't like it. Hey I was fooled. I will just get over it and move on.

After all we are better off for it in the long run. As someone said about adversity 'if it doesn't kill you it will make you stronger'.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neocondriac Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. We now rank .....
44th in the world with regard to freedom and accuracy of our media. Right behind Spain which was communist until the early 80's.Talk about a fall from grace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Spain was fascist until the late 70's not communist.
The fascist leader Franco died in 1975 and his regime crumbled about two years later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. In related news: FEC declares bloggers are Journalists.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5390205&mesg_id=5390205

Life was much easier when the news was reported by CBS, NBC, ABC, The Washington Post, The New York Times, AP, UPI, and for those of us who had shortwave radios, the BBC.

Interesting times, these...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. RawStory is replacing NYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It looks like Sponge Bob is happy about that
Raw! Raw! RawStory!

Yep. Interesting times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is this a subversive plan to destroy NYT and WaPo credibility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Credibility is earned. Its not something that someone just 'has'
Edited on Fri Nov-18-05 01:05 PM by NNN0LHI
They both need to clean house and neither seem inclined to do so.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC