Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doug Feith is now under investigation!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:12 AM
Original message
Doug Feith is now under investigation!
I just heard this on CNN! Something about his office and the war????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. False intelligence
Altering intelligence, witholding intelligence! Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good... One More (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read that in the morning paper. Made breakfast all the better.
Maybe we can send the whole cabal to Guantanamo when ALL of the indictments come down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. But by the DOD Inspector General - not an entirely independent entity
I wonder if he'll be Rummy's scapegoat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. The IG works for GAO, not Pentagon....
They generally do a good job on investigations, but, have no prosecutorial teeth. They have to find someone in Justice or the Congress to actually prosecute.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Are you sure of that?
I'll keep my tinfoil hat off and hope for the best. :-)

http://www.dodig.osd.mil/ig.html

The military Inspector General in America has traditionally served as "an extension of the eyes, ears, and conscience of the Commander." Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, "the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall . . . be the principal adviser to the Secretary of Defense for matters relating to the prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse in the programs and operations of the Department."

The law also requires the Inspector General "to keep the and the Congress fully and currently informed . . . concerning fraud and other serious problems, abuses, and deficiencies . . . ." In carrying out all of the other statutory duties, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense is obligated by law to "give particular regard to the activities of the internal audit, inspection, and investigative units of the military departments with a view towards avoiding duplication and insuring effective coordination and cooperation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. Gawd, I'm so confused...
Thanks for the correction.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. That's incorrect. IGs are independent, but report to the agency head.
Thus, the Inspector General for DoD would report to Rumsfeld. However ...
Are IGs independent?

Yes, IGs are independent. While by law, IG's are under the general supervision of the agency head or deputy, neither the agency head nor the deputy can prevent or prohibit an IG from conducting an audit or investigation.

The IGs are authorized to:

* have direct access to all records and information of the agency,
* have ready access to the agency head,
* conduct such investigations and issue such reports as the IG thinks appropriate (with limited national security and law enforcement exceptions),
* issue subpoenas for information and documents outside the agency (with same limited exceptions),
* administer oaths for taking testimony, and
* hire and control their own staff and contract resources.

Who oversees the IGs?

* The IGs serve under the general supervision of the agency head. Yet, by statute, IGs have a dual and independent reporting relationship to the agency head and to the Congress.

* Allegations of misconduct against an IG should be referred to the Integrity Committee of the President=s Council on Integrity and Efficiency (PCIE).

http://www.ignet.gov/igs/faq1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. See post 36 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neocondriac Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Now that's what I call.........
a "Feith Based Initiative"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You know? My day was starting off pretty well....
until that pun. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neocondriac Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Sorry Tex........lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. laughing and groaning at the same time :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. whewie-doggie, seems like enough people gettin investigated
to be a conspiracy or sumthin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I was talking to a friend last night. She lives out of state, and
although she detessts ShrubCo, there are sooo many things she just hasn't heard about. I was trying to fill her in on some things, but eventually had to say "There are SOOO many investigations, indictments, committee researches etc, I just can't remember all the damn names anymore!

I remember the big ones, but it seems like there's a new one almost every day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. If I hadn't been turned on to DU, I'd be 100% clueless. What an educa-
tion this is. Can your friend pop by and "study up"? And you're right, we need a playbook to keep up, this is a mindboggling array of characters here...ha ha, "indicted" characters, at that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. We'll have to out-source the investigations to indians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fitzgerald deserves kudos, fawning emails, salutes, and gifts from
the people he is helping to break free from the shackles of corruption... uh... that be you and me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. delete
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 10:25 AM by havocmom
wrong post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. Does anyone have a link for this? It's the first I've heard of it.
I must have missed it on CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. This link is the first one I found.
http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/story.asp?j=163083882&p=y63x84588

"The Pentagon’s inspector general is investigating claims that an office run by US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s former policy chief engaged in illegal intelligence activities before the start of the Iraq war.

The investigation into Douglas Feith, which two senators requested two months ago, comes at a particularly contentious point in the political debate over President George Bush’s decision to invade Iraq and the intelligence upon which Bush based his decision."

I just heard a blip on CNN during a headline update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thank you!
So it's the Pentagon investigating itself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I know, but I don't care. It's ANOTHER bone on the pile!
It seems like, soon, it's going to be easier to make a list of people who aren't under investigation than a list of those who are!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. Kick for Rec n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. He spread the lie that Iraq hid WMDs in Syria. He had the Weekly
Standard leak that info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Not a FOUNDING MEMBER of the PNAC's rag!!!
William Kristol gives me the creeps!:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. "The stupidest motherf*cker on the face of the planet"
That's how Richard Armitage referred to Feith. I doubt if Feith can weave a web of lies as smoothly as Rove. He'll probably create a hole so big in his defense that you can drive a Mack truck through it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. Isn't he the guy with the Osama&Saddam BS?
Authoring a book on Clinton being guilty for 911? Or am I mixing a8holes again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. I told a fellow at the gym yesterday;
"When you start hearing and seeing the phrase "Office of Special Plans" in the media... it's over for the administration.

He said he couldn't wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Thrilled to hear it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBlix Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Gen. Franks was Right
Gen. Tommy Franks in Bob Woodward's Plan of Attack, in which Franks calls Feith "the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth."
.
But then Feith knew exactly what he was up to didn't he. Pre-emptively attack Iraq "sell the war" using phony forged, false intel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Seems to me there are a lot of competitors for that title amongst
the Repugs. :D

Welcome to DU, DrBlix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. Another in the crook roundup; I hope more to follow. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. Is that the Doug Feith who supervises Israeli spy Larry Franklin?
Why would such a person be under investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I believe it is indeed....
...another PNAC/AIPAC connection? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Why would they want to investigate such a person?
Boy, that justice department must be on the ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
35. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC