Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wait a minute. The Dems weren't supporting Murtha's resolution either

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:36 AM
Original message
Wait a minute. The Dems weren't supporting Murtha's resolution either
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 11:44 AM by tgnyc
until the GOP stunt re-writing of it. The bottom line remains that the Dems are still uncomfortable with seriously discussing the imminent removal of US troops from Iraq. Only a fraction of Dems voted no last night because the GOP resolution varied from Murtha's by what appears to be a six-month window. Most voted no because they are not interested in calling for a withdrawal anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. From a strictly ethical standpoint I agree.
As we are wrongfully occupying Iraq and as our presence causes harm to the Iraqis we should, regardless of the cost and danger, pull our troops out immediately.

From a political standpoint the chaos and destruction that would take place from an unplanned and immediate retreat is unacceptable. I'm fine with a six month timeframe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dems were not afforded the opportunity
to "seriously" discuss the issue because of the gop stunt. As the 2006 election draws closer, republicans will accept Murtha's resolution with open arms as they face losing the Senate and the House. They will take it as their own and denounce Murtha as a war monger. It is the way conservatives do business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think a planned withdrawal as soon as possible is what most want.
Not to be boxed in to something the GOP tries make sound as close as possible to "cutting and running."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Dem's were supporting the need to open a national debate on
our policy and future of our commitment.

Murtha made it ABUNDANTLY clear in his press conference that these were his ideas. He told the press to go ask the other Representatives what their thoughts were.

Opening a national debate.

Now the Repubs have hardened the lines. They have declared "it's my way or the highway." They have moved to squelch all public debate.

From a reasoned, moderate stance to a hardened McCarthy-Style Conservative Resolution that carries no weight. Light weight, just like the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. After this stunt, I'd like to see how they'd vote NOW
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 11:42 AM by Canuckistanian
On Murtha's original resolution.

I think they'd get the support they need from back home now.

That is, unless everyone is sick of the grandstanding and personal insults. I don't think the general opinion of Congress went up because of yesterday's shenanigans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Pelosi's remarks, from right after Murtha's press conference
snip>
Ms. Pelosi. Today, I think we should all savor the very thoughtprovoking statement that Mr. Murtha made. He made it with great knowledge. He made it with great passion. He made it with great determination. I think it is something we have to take into consideration very seriously.

Q Politically speaking, does that hurt Democrats to not come out with one voice? Obviously, the President is not doing well in large part because of the public concern about the war. Does it not put pressure on you as Leader to get your Caucus or work with Senator Reid to get one message so that the public sees an alternative?

Ms. Pelosi. I guess where you and I differ on this conversation, when it comes to war I don't think we should be politically speaking. This is about protecting the American people, and we have to do the right thing.

Q But politics puts people in charge.

Ms. Pelosi. That's right. And the President is in charge, and it's his war. It's Mr. Bush's war, and he should be held accountable for it.

Q To what extent are Mr. Murtha's views shared within the caucus?

Ms. Pelosi. The courage of his statement, and the eloquence with which he presented it, and the passion and knowledge that he brought to the conversation were met very positively by our colleagues. What that means in terms of their votes remains to be seen.

link

She also reiterates her consistent opposition to the war, but this is about as far as it could go without co-opting rep's votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Links, please.
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 11:43 AM by Cerridwen
Only a fraction of Dems voted no last night because the GOP resolution varied from Murtha's by what appears to be a six-month window.


Links?

Most voted no because they are not interested in calling for a withdrawal anytime soon.


Links?

Edit: Oops, forgot to say thanks for the links.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
afdip Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. most of the democrats have no cojones . . . murtha is different
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's why this was such a coup for the Dems!!!
They were able to have a debate about the war knowing that the Repukes had made a mistake by making the resolution so entirely unpalatable!!!

I am so proud of how the Dems made lemonade from the lemons the repukes threw at them!! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. The bullshit resolution last night
was irresponsible and unimplementable. It bore no resemblence to Murtha's resolution, other than it did set a timetable: now.

The Democrats, in my opinion, should have either walked out or voted 'present', however I am not upset with 'no'. I personally would have voted yes, but I am not running for anything.

Murtha has indeed made a lot of Democrats uncomfortable. A lot of them were quite happy in their snuggly safe-zone wrapped in the flag and supporting the warnterra. But their peeps, lead by Saint Cindy of the Ditch, got in front of them and took them right out of their warm snuggly comfort zone. So first we saw idiotic proposals for getting out in two years or more, tied to some nirvana of Freemon'n'moxy somehow bestowing itself on Iraq, but at least they were talking about actually getting out. And then Murtha dropped the bomb and said: 'it's bullshit, pull the troops out in six months and let the Iraqis deal with their problems.' This is indeed WAY outside the snuggly warnterra comfort zone our non-Opposition Party put itself in way back on 911. But there are all of us peeps out here and we aren't buying their bullshit anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. nicely said ... love that "warnterra" ...
DU's candidate operatives are hiding in there little burrow holes still refusing to discuss the justifications for withdrawal that Murtha raised ...

check out this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2263098&mesg_id=2263098
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Let's look at at this way: what if the GOP had agreed to a vote on Murtha
proposal last night. What percentage of the Dems would have voted yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Good question.
I'd love to know the answer. However what Murtha has done is to change the debate entirely. Essentially the debate is now, although The Cabal and their minions won't admit it, about when we are going to "cut and run" rather than if we should cut and run.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oregonindy Donating Member (790 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. most politicians are either demopublican or republicrat...very few
like kucinich, conyers and the like actually stand for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dutchdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nobody's going anywhere
Not with 12 brand spanking new military bases parked on the world's second largest oil pond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. i think murtha went the furthest in bringing troop home. this is
progression and the way it works is an idea is taken to extreme. people get used to and comfortable with it and they can move forward. we have watched kerry help this process for 10 months now. people want the end result to happen first, that isnt how progression works. the interesting thing with muthra

his has been the most extreme. dems were wary because it was so far forward. then murtha was shamefully attacked. that allowed dems to support murtha in character and integrity. that was grand for dems. bad for repugs. then the trippy thing is that repugs gave us a gift last night wit their outrageous, most extreme proposal

that makes murthas proposal moderate, no longer extreme. the repugs are the ones that will allow progression to take a huge step forward by putting out the most extreme and allowing the dems to say, no...... now they can go to muthra and say, but...... muthra proposal is reasonable

i am seeing this as a gift. i think it will be easier for dems to now support murtha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Very good explanation. Thank you.
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. thanks. i think so. i think i want to put on own thread. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. it wasn't Murtha's resolution
it was Hunter's. Quite a floor fight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC