Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Can you imagine working for a company that has more than 500 employees...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ShrewdLiberal Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 03:43 PM
Original message
"Can you imagine working for a company that has more than 500 employees...
with the following statistics?

29% have been accused of spousal abuse.

7% have been arrested for fraud.

19% have been accused of writing bad checks.

77 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least two businesses.

3 have done time for assault.

71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit.

14 have been arrested on drug-related charges.

8 have been arrested for shoplifting.

21 are currently defendants in lawsuits.

84 were arrested for drunk driving during the last 18 months.

What organization is this? It's the 535 members of the United States Congress -- the same group that cranks out hundreds of new laws each year to keep the rest of us in line!" -- Coffee News of Western New York, November 19th Edition, 2005.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Urban Legend type email from 1999.
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 03:47 PM by Lex
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/congress.htm

"No names or dates are mentioned, of course, so trying to match individuals with the vague charges levelled in this text would be a fruitless task (especially since the composition of Congress changes at least every two years, and the piece is undated). In any case that effort would be pointless, for this article is nothing more than a cheap smear: no one in it is cited as actually having done something wrong, but merely of having been "arrested" or "accused," or being a "defendant," or having been "stopped." Isn't our system supposed to be based upon the presumption that a person is innocent until proved guilty?"







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShrewdLiberal Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the heads up.
I had no idea. I just received this in the mail today and thought it interesting. Now I know it's not true, or, at the most, just half truths. Interesting, nontheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well the Republicans in Congress are a bunch of lying warmongerers
and even Bush and Cheney have like 5 or 6 Drunk Driving Arrests between them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. One must remember
There is never an honest judgment where there is no court! Very few politicians past or present have ever had to have a "day in court". They are usually considered immune to all types of criminal accusations, from beating wife and children to killing a person while driving drunk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ummmm...or as noted in response #1, its an urban legend.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's nothing...
How about a company where the CEO has been arrested once for theft and twice for DUI and is a former alcholic and rumoured to also be a former coke addict?

How about a company where the CEO lied on his resume and hires unqualified buddies for important specialized jobs and as board members with the firm?

How about a company where the CEO has lied many times to the stockholders about a hostile takeover bid?

How about a company where the CEO failed to act promptly in two different emergencies when he had prior warning of these emergencies?

How about a company where the CEO has vastly padded his resume and appears to have no substantial work history prior to age 40?

How about a company where the CEO has made such poor financial decisions as to put it trillions of dollars into debt when it was on sound financial ground prior to his taking over?

Let's add to that a VP at the firm who is still working for another company in a clear conflict of interest, who has 3 DUI arrests of his own, and whose executive assistant is under investigation for leaking insider information as are numerous other members of the firm.

Hmm...What I wonder would we call that firm?

BUSHCO, Inc.

Doug D.
Orlando, FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC