Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Security adviser named as source in CIA scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Kevin Spidel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:18 PM
Original message
Security adviser named as source in CIA scandal
Security adviser named as source in CIA scandal
Michael Smith and Sarah Baxter

THE mysterious source who gave America’s foremost journalist, Bob Woodward, a tip-off about the CIA agent at the centre of one of Washington’s biggest political storms was Stephen Hadley, the White House national security adviser, according to lawyers close to the investigation.

Woodward, the Washington Post reporter who broke the Watergate scandal that forced President Richard Nixon out of office, has refused publicly to divulge the name of his informant without permission, which has thus far been withheld.

The naming of CIA agent Valerie Plame as the wife of Joseph Wilson, the former US ambassador sent to Niger to investigate disputed claims that Saddam Hussein was trying to purchase uranium yellowcake for the manufacture of nuclear weapons, led to the indictment last month of Vice-President Dick Cheney’s top aide, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, for lying to a grand jury.

It is an offence in America to reveal the identity of a covert agent, although doubts remain about Plame’s precise status.

A spokeswoman for the National Security Council (NSC) denied that Hadley was the journalist’s source. However, in South Korea on Friday during an official visit with President George W Bush, Hadley dodged the question.



More here: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-1880016,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. One step closer to the Oval Office. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't he Condi's Assistant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, under GW Bush's first term he was....
He was the Deputy National Security Advisor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Wasn't that in the same tim frame? nt

Just asking cause I don't think Condi told on Plame.

I think it was Bush that told Woody.

He is just so dumb that he doesn't know left from left.

If Rove told him, he would tell Woody in a heartbeat in order to appear "smart."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. This confirms
that it was Hadley who told Woodward. It was not Bush, Rice, or Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Once again, our Sages WAY out in front of this story..
God, we got some schmarties in here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yet another story that RAW STORY broke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LaLa Rah Rah!. . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Taking the dive for LIbby?
Someone on Amy Goodman suggested that Woodward coming out like this provides an alibi for Libby. Personally I don't think so; Libby still lied and obstructed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yep
They might be trying to but I don't think it'll work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yeah. Their logic is underwhelming
from the article:

With more journalists in the loop than previously identified, it will be harder for Fitzgerald to prove Libby was deliberately lying when he said he first learnt of Plame from a journalist rather than the CIA.


Since Libby said he first heard about Plame from Timmy Russert (which was just one of his lies under oath), and not some vague "journalists in the loop," I don't see how Woodward's jump into the fray changes anything for Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. It is not helping Libby
or anyone else in the administration. This in no way whatsoever changes the case against Libby. The only potential benefit he could reap would be that, because of the increased vulnerability of the VP's office, that Bush will be tempted to pardon him. But in terms of his trial, it makes zero difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. So the Security Advisor intentionally jeoparizes our security
We are in greater danger because his need for revenge was stronger than his love of country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. k & r....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. If this is true...
Then certainly Hadley has testified under oath before the Grand Jury. And chances are strong he lied about Woodward, since Fitzgerald didn't know about the Woodward info until recently.

It was reported that Hadley was already speculating he'd be indicted. I think there's a good chance Fitzgerald is bringing back a Grand Jury to indict Hadley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. you forgot about the rover
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 09:16 PM by Halliburton
he could be bringing back a grand jury to take out a man named turdblossom as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulthompson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Right
I was just looking at the Hadley situation, no idea what might be happening with Rove and others. I'm just saying that at a BARE MINIMUM, Hadley looks like he could be charged with perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. WHIG levels of authority -
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 09:39 PM by higher class
1st level:

George.
Dick.
Condi.

2nd level:

Matalin
Libby
Hadley
Rove
Hughes
Wilkinson
Calio
Hadley

Does anyone here think that a political decision on the level of breaking a law originated at the second level and not the first?

Does anyone think that Cheney didn't have the motives. It appears the Brewster-Jennings operation was 'tracking traffic' that he was involved in. That is traffic as in wmd and nuclear parts and knowledge. Cheney is first and foremost a political and corporate mobster who may also be a traitor - if bringing down a CIA operation is being traitorous because of his need to perpetuate war for his own profit and the profit of some friends and benefactors is traitorous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. Everybody at the WH was talking to as many reporters as possible?
That is what it looks like. The question should be who was not talking? That would be easier to figure out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. And RAW Story will never get the credit
Raw scooped EVERYBODY'S ASS on this one and I will make certain and write every newscaster who reads this story to America.

Credit should be given where credit is due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. You are absolutely right
and there are several DUer's who owe apologies for their attempts to discredit Raw Story. IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC