Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Bush cannot quit Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:19 PM
Original message
Why Bush cannot quit Iraq

It is pretty obvious that if Bush quits Iraq, then his stand on the "War on Terror" comes to a halt. That means all the terror phobia that is being used to control the US public has to also end.

That would mean the control of war powers would return to the elected members and away from the pResident.

That means a virtual end to the Bush / Cheney cabal of running the US.

It is impossible for Bush to even think of withdrawing from Iraq because the War pResident reign comes to an END!!

That means he has no ability to try to start a war with Iran or Syria without going back to the Congress and Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's what it also means;
NO MORE OIL.
=we are going to be FORCED to find alternative fuel sources.
NOW.
Oh, damn, there go the large investments our SAUDI neighbors made in our OIL BASED ECONOMY.
OOPS.

Follow the money; follow the money...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Hi MindMatter!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Then we'll have to impeach his sorry ass.
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 11:29 PM by marylanddem
I'm afraid you're right - he is so into this & all the war power it gives him. I do not think he is capable of reversing course. That leaves it to we the people and our elected representatives in Congress to raise holy hell until this bloodbath is ended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. You mean then we would see this was all a ......
dog and pony show? That these guys were lying from the get-go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Iraq is now in a civil war
So how is W going to justify staying there and killing our troops? See www.icasualties.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He believes he does not have to justify anything

He deals in rhetoric not human lives, big phony abstractions about
loving "freedom" (I have no idea what he means by that) and fighting a "war on terror" (which of course would never have an end). There is no changing Bush's head, we can only demand an end to his terrible reign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtowngman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:27 PM
Original message
Simply by saying...
Edited on Sat Nov-19-05 11:30 PM by mtowngman
"we must stay the course until the job is done" heard it a hundred times during the debate last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's why they cannot quit Iraq...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. there in lies the trap
Dems call for the end of the war, we pull out. weeks later, a "terrorist" attack hits the usa, all the talking heads will be saying the Dems allowed it to happen & with a panic taking hold in the populance, they will buy it. The republicans will then use it to expand their power even more.

PNAC part II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. he COULD send the troops back to afghanistan
and/or actually try to find the 'folks' responsible for 9/11....

but there's no real oil in THAT war....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Osama has been dead for years!!
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osama_dead.html

Osama bin Laden is dead. The news first came from sources in Afghanistan and Pakistan almost six months ago: the fugitive died in December (2001) and was buried in the mountains of southeast Afghanistan. Pakistan's president, Pervez Musharraf, echoed the information. The remnants of Osama's gang, however, have mostly stayed silent, either to keep Osama's ghost alive or because they have no means of communication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. i don't buy the fixation on osama anyway
it reeks of america's penchant for personalizing evil.

i tend to believe the that al qaeda is a loose organization, with osama simply being the top guy/financer/inspirational leader. i don't think he necessarily had much to do with 9/11 itself, or the planning thereof, any more than the a mafia boss necessarily knows much about the planning of any particular crime within his 'family'.

that doesn't make him any less responsible, but it does imply that there's a much more directly involved middle layer that hasn't been publicly identified or held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Good point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Iraq ... the "centerpiece on dimson's war on terror"
centerpiece because Iraq has vast oilfields (212 billion bbls) guaranteed plus half the country (Iraq) is unexplored. As we learned
recently Big Oil sat in with prick cheney during the march 2001 Energy
Task Force meetings divvying up Iraq into 14 parcels for exploration.
Its about oil,oil,oil,oil,oil,oil,oil,oil,oil,oil,oil,oil has nothing
to do with WMD's,nothing to do with a free and Democratic Iraq although that would be a feather in king george's cap.Its all about
the frigging oil............
At least 30 yrs worth of OIL,OIL,OIL,OIL,OIL,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. If he quits, he gets blamed for losing, & this imbecile can't accept blame
not even a shred of it. He'd rather be responsible for an additional 100,000 deaths than accept any blame for a failure in Iraq. That is why he's staying the course. No good fucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. If Bush leaves Iraq a mess - a failure
then his oneupmanship of his Daddy goes in the toilet. He cannot allow that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. then there's the matter of air bases
"...the military has more than $1.2 billion in construction under way or on the drawing board to upgrade 16 air bases throughout the Middle East and Southwest Asia."

from the NY Times.




Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. Aesop had a fable
A man tells his boy to reach into a pitcher and grab some walnuts. The boy, greedily, grabs the biggest handful he possibly can. But the neck of the pitcher doesn't allow him to pull his hand out. Unwilling to let loose of any of the walnuts, but unable to get his hand out, the boy begins to cry.

Now, in the fable, the father gently tells his son to release some of the walnuts, that is, settle for less than all he can grab. Unfortunately for our nation, its military personnel, its Treasury, and just about everything good in the world, the little boy in the White House won't turn loose and he can't get his hand out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. If the boy hadn't let go, I expect his dad would've had to make him let go
Edited on Sun Nov-20-05 12:33 AM by Marr
Which is where we're going. People are waking up here. I just hope they realize soon that they have the power to smack the walnuts out of this greedy little bastards hand's anytime they choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That is why Bush is not

on speaking terms with his Dad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC