Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Faux Fox News reports that Tennent in the private meeting today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:31 AM
Original message
Faux Fox News reports that Tennent in the private meeting today
revealed the names of White House aides who insisted
the phony Niger info go in.

BWAAAAAAAAA. Hee heee heee. haw haw haw.

And then I had this flash......of poppy bush going
in to have a little friendly talk with dickie boy
begging him to resign........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Named names, eh?
Hoo boy! If that's true things are rolling along a lot quicker than I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:33 AM
Original message
hmmm
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 12:37 AM by nadinbrzezinski
fox says such...

hmmm.....

are they setting condy for the fall?
Ari already left

then again it is fox...

doubt anything coming from less than fair or balanced.

Will check the wires....

and here it is...

Condy come over here, won't hurt a bit... head on
choping block, please.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=512&e=1&u=/ap/20030717/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gee.. not a very private meeting , is it??
if Faux is allowed the information, and then they blab it..:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hah! That's it. BushCo's done.
It's Bush v. CIA. Is there a psychologist on the board who could comment on this? The DimSon disses his father's organization, so naturally they turn on him and take him down. The Bush family really are the Corleones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. for a reason
Mike Malloy calls them the Bush Crime Family, anybody willing
to watch that trilogy after this?

I am a writer and I could not come up with this plot and sell
it, too freaking unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Link to Story....a must read
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 12:49 AM by Old and In the Way
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,92068,00.html

But Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., said the issue wasn't why Tenet failed to keep the information out of the speech but who was so determined to put it in and why.

"All roads still lead back to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue," he said, referring to the White House address. "The question is, who in the White House was so determined to put information in the State of the Union which had been discounted so dramatically by American intelligence sources?"

Durbin and other Democrats said Tenet had named White House officials who had sought to include the information in the speech, but the Democrats declined to identify them, citing the confidentiality of the proceedings.

---------------------------

But this is priceless-

Democrats say the question comes down to whether the intelligence supported the urgency of the threat the White House portrayed and whether Bush ignored caveats and qualifiers that may have made the case for war less compelling.

But Republican Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond (search), R-Mo., said that intelligence is supposed to be non-partisan and not second-guessed.

" ultimately proved successful for winning the war in Iraq, and number two, pointing out the fact of weapons of mass destruction, had we not intervened, might have in the future resulted in nuclear weapons. So this is regrettably a politicization of intelligence," Bond told Fox News

Riiiight....we had to invade because maybe in the fuure some country might have nuclear weapons and they might want to use them on us....a perfect pre-emptive policy to invade any country we decide might be a future problem. I'm sure Kit would have come to Clinton's defense if he had done these very same things...











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Kitt Bond Is an Idiot
Again, Uranium is a necessary ingredient of nuclear power. Bond is betting that enough Americans don't know that, and think the purchase
of uraniun is for nuclear weapons. He's betting on the stupidity of Americans to achieve his GOP agnda. God, I hope people wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. This isn't going to go away
They may try to amputate all the limbs before gangrene sets in. But this is going to be an election 04 issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC