Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Manual: against the 'laws of war' to fire white phosphorous on ppl

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 09:40 AM
Original message
Army Manual: against the 'laws of war' to fire white phosphorous on ppl
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/5185


IRAQ: ARMY SAID USE OF WHITE PHOSPHOROUS WEAPONS VIOLATED LAW OF WAR

BY: Judd Legum, Nico Pitney, Payson Schwin, Faiz Shakir and Amanda Terkel.

SOURCE: APAF's 11-21-05 column, "Progress Report."


Reversing numerous prior denials, Pentagon officials admitted last
week that the deadly incendiary white phosphorous was, in fact, "used
as a weapon against insurgent strongholds during the battle of Fallujah
last November." <1> <2> But the Bush administration defended its use,
claiming that phosphorus is "not outlawed or illegal." <3>

Yet new reports show that the Instruction Manual used by the U.S. Army
Command and General Staff School (CGSC) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas,
"teaches senior officers it is against the 'laws of war' to fire the
incendiary
weapon at human targets." <4> According to the UK Independent, the Army
manual "makes clear that white phosphorus can be used to produce a smoke
screen. But it adds: 'It is against the law of land warfare to employ WP
against personnel targets.'" <5>

However, the U.S. military repeatedly fired white phosphorous weapons against
human targets inside the city of Fallujah during its siege in November of
2004.
When white phosphorous particles come in contact with human skin, they will
burn through the flesh down to the bone.

ENDNOTES

<1> ATSDR's article, "ToxFAQs For White Phosphorous":
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts103.html

<2> Judd Legum, et al., APAF's11-17-05 Progress Report,
"Iraq: The Truth About White Phosphorous":
http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&b=914257&ct=1611327#4

<3> David Charter, Michael Evans and Richard Beeston's 11-17-05 Times
Online article, "Phosphorous Was Used For Fallujah Bombs, Admits US":
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-1875728,00.html

<4> Andrew Buncombe's 11-19-05 Independent article, "US Army Rules Say:
'Don't Use WP Against People'":
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas327926.ece

<5> Ibid.
_______________________________________________________________
FINALLY, PLEASE READ 4 ESSAYS FOR BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THIS ISSUE:

George Monbiot's 11-15-05 CD/GU essay, "The U.S. Used Chemical Weapons
In Iraq - And Then Lied About It" :
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1115-29.htm

Dave Lindorff's 11-17-05 CP essay, "In Post-Saddam Iraq There Are
No Civilians: How The Pentagon Justifies Phosphorous Bombs On Fallujah":
http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff11172005.html

Reuters' 11-17-05 CNN editorial, "Torture And Phosphorous Disclosures
Hurt US-Iraqi Image" torture and chemical weapons on his own people. However, the US military
has used torture, white phosphorous and napalm weapons against the Iraqis.]:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/11/17/iraq.analysis.reut/index.html

Anonymous Author's 11-17-05 A2K essay, "Iraq: US Used White Phosphorous
As An Offensive Weapon" :
http://www.able2know.com/forums/about63652.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does anyone really doubt this cabal will stop at nothing to achieve its
objectives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. In another month this will hit the mainstream press
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, it sure is
a violation

Thanks for posting this!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Hague. I want to see them all indicted, tried and convicted
at The Hague. Murderers.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Me too. Yet another law broken by these criminals. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. violation?
Edited on Sun Nov-27-05 11:30 AM by leftchick
War Crimes! War Crimes!!!! Off to The Hague with them all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Please send this one around to your email lists. Even to the right
winged family nuts. How can one argue with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. ~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. I`m so sickened by this.
War crimes. Plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I saw part of the film
on Democracy Now! a bombardment and burned bodies, it was horrifying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC