Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vandehei: "Big Story" in WaPo tomorrow

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:20 PM
Original message
Vandehei: "Big Story" in WaPo tomorrow
on Countdown he said that they were working on a big story and it didn't take long for Luskin to get to it. Vandehei didn't want to reveal too much but he did say that "sources close to Rove" believe that Viveca Novak will totally exonerate Rove. Boy, he sure knows how to water down expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. What are "sources close to Rove" supposed to say, that she
will nail his ass to the barn door? I don't put too much stock in what was said tonight. How could something Rove's lawyer said to a reporter exonerate Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Exonerated From What???
We've got several charges floating out there. Does she prove Rove wasn't the one who was the original leaker...who first put Plame's name out there? Wonderful. Let's party.

But how about the conspiracy of covering up Fitzgerald's investigation? How does she exonerate Rove on this one? Or his 4 various stories to the grand jury that required him to tap dance on the head of a pin the last time to avoid being nailed. Does she have some secret testimony that coroborates all 4 Rove testimonies?

Fitzgerald is the one who decides...not Vandehei or any of his WaPo lakeys. Remember, this is Bob Woodward's paper...one that is to be as trusted now as the New York Slimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. lol....."sources close to Rove".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes2000 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. The only way Novak exonerates Rove
is if she knew that Plame was an agent BEFORE the White House leaked it.

Even if it's true though, that does not exonerate Rove from his lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Even then Rove would be in trouble for mishandling
classified info.

Even if there were rumors about Plame being undercover, Rove or anyone with knowledge of her status should not confirm or deny the truthfulness of the rumors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rove has been "totally exonerated" multiple times
people keep forgetting to tell Fitzgerald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Raw story
spoke to Exoneration of Rove. Stated Rove will not be exonerated

http://tinyurl.com/cap5h
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Rove pleaing and testifying against Libby would....
be interesting. Rove will slither his way out of this but I hope that at least a few Pukes do the perp walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Oh, they'll do it. Keep the faith, y'all. Fitz filed THOUSANDS
of pages of documents. Probably tens of thousands. He didn't do that to indict only Scooter, trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. WaPo, home of the Wayward Woodward School of Sourcing
is saying they believe a source, again, about their own client. Princess Rove has been on the dangerous edge of exoneration so many times and he keeps begging media frogs to kiss him. Into the breach goes the whore media...:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. ARE YOU SURE YOU HEARD RIGHT?
How the hell could a source exonerate ROve? No one source could
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good point. I can't imagine a scenario where that would happen, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I heard it too. Also sounded like KO did some obligatory
scripted right wing talking point, although it didn't sound like he wanted to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Who cares what the Rove sources say.
I only listen to what Fitzgerald says. And he ain't saying nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. neocons using righty "journalists" to jail the press in the future
check
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC