Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question:my nephew said in Iraq they guarded "Iranian terrorists"..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 04:55 PM
Original message
Question:my nephew said in Iraq they guarded "Iranian terrorists"..
He was there about a yr ago, and said he was stationed at one of the 'safest' places in Iraq. He said his unit was in charge of keeping an eye on what he called "Iranian terrorists", a group of about 7 or 8 men from Iran. He said they would drive these Iranians to Baghdad in a convoy, and let them go shopping.

Wondering what this is about, and if anyone can enlighten me on the information he told me.

sidenote: He was told that he could either go back to Iraq after Christmas, or do 'peacekeeping' in Egypt. He opted for Egypt. Hes in the Guard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. It would be good to know who those Iranian shoppers know in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. exactly
nothin about this crazy ass war makes sense to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. *scratches head* I don't get it. do you mean they were babysitting them or
being their jailers?

why would they label them as "terrorists" but let them go shopping?

I R confuzzled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. the way he explained it, it was babysitting
taking care of em, giving them 'backup' and protection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mujahedeen-al-Khalq? Saddam supported them against Tehran,
now we're doing the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He never gave me a name
just that he had this ironic job to do, and of course even though these men were never labeled terrorists by their CO, they by god knew that's what they were.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. MEK. John Ashcrofts pet terrorist group. They are our Iranian terrorists
Edited on Fri Dec-02-05 08:34 PM by NNN0LHI
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6242223/site/newsweek/

Shades of Gray

The Duelfer report alleges that Saddam gave funds to a listed terror group. But the claim does little to advance the White House case for war

Oct. 13 - The new report by chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer contains evidence that Saddam Hussein allegedly used the United Nations-managed Oil-for-Food program to provide millions of dollars in subsidies to a group the U.S. State Department has branded a foreign terrorist organization.

But so far, the Bush administration has made little of Duelfer’s surprise discovery which, on its face, would seem to strengthen White House claims that Saddam’s regime had longstanding ties to terrorism.

In fact, U.S. officials concede, the Duelfer finding does little to advance the administration’s case and could even be politically awkward. The State Department designated terrorist group in question, is the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK)—an Iranian opposition group that was long backed by Saddam’s regime as a counterweight to the Tehran government. Not only does the MEK have no connection either to September 11 or Al Qaeda, in the past, it has had strong support from members of Congress—including leading Republicans in both chambers and a current Bush cabinet member, Attorney General John Ashcroft.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC