If Saddam Was Behind 9/11, Then Why Isn't He Being Charged With It

[Yavin4]

He's on trial, right?

A very simple, excellent question that no one in the media is asking.

I heard it this morning on AAR.

[Ian David]

1. Why do you hate freedom?

:sarcasm:

[nickyt]

2. How stupid am I that I never considered this??! Very! But what a

great point! Thanks for this -

[0007]

5. Count me in, I was riding the studity train also.

[HeeBGBz]

15. I'm right there with ya

Great point, though.

[Xithras]

3. I don't think anyone suggested that Saddam was behind 9/11.

Just that he supported terrorism, and that he had a terrorist training camp in Baghdad. I think there were also accusations of financial ties between Hussein and bin Ladin.

If the Bushbots accused Saddam of masterminding 9/11, they'd have to also say that bin Ladin didn't do it. That would undermine the entire war in Afghanistan.

[Yavin4]

11. Cheney Himself Said That Saddam's People Met With Atta

He said so himself.

[corbett]

4. OF COURSE Administration Linked Him To 9/11!!!

Ignore any posts which try to deflect this now.

On a happier note, here's a URL which you can share to help spread the truth about who REALLY was behind 9/11:

https://secure.reopen911.org/freedvd.php

[AgadorSparticus]

6. darn good point, there!! can't wait to see the spin on this....

[Disturbed]

7. The Bush Regime is clever with it's language.

None ever said that Saddam was involved with the 911 Attack. They merely inserted his name or Iraq in the same sentence mentioning 911. They did say that Saddam had contacts with al Q but that was debunked by the 911 Commission. Later Bush and Cheney said that there was no evidence linking Saddam to the 911 Attack even though the slight inference was persistently hinted at. They did manage to spread the perception without ever stating an outright accusation of his involvement.

[FreedomAngel82]

8. Exactly!

So true.

[Al-CIAda]

9. FOX's Wallace vs. Levin: Who's rewriting history now?

Wallace tries to sandbag Levin: Who's rewriting history now?

Chris Wallace plays a sound bite that he thinks clears President Bush of trying to connect Saddam and al-Qaeda.

Bush: Both of them need to be dealt with. The war on terror is-you can't distinguish between al-Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror..

Video-WMP Video-QT

Wallace did everything he could to make it seem that Bush never linked to two. Is he kidding? Levin did a good job of fighting back. (hat tip Dave Edwards for the video)

MUST SEE video, imo-
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/11/27.html#a6070

[banana republican]

10. good question kick n/t

[SammyWinstonJack]

12. Why you un American Unpatriotic fool! What's wrong with you?

:sarcasm: Excellent question btw! Hey lurking FReeps care to answer it?

[Arkana]

13. You know, I never considered that.

Why isn't Saddam Hussein being charged with the events of 9/11 if he made it happen? Could it be because the Iraq/Qaeda link is...fake?

[Fire Walk With Me]

14. Good one!

Just like "what did Bush do to defend the US and the troops from the terrible WMD Saddam undoubtedly had which they believed in completely but not enough to take any documented special precautions to protect the US and the troops sent in to destroy them".

BushCo is like the old Sat Night Live sketch about the phone company with Lilly Tomlin: "We're the phone company. We don't care. We don't have to."

[StefanX]

16. That's a very good point

nt

[Kansas Wyatt]

17. Safely tucked away in Dick Cheney's Bunker...

Is heavily guarded documentation that directly links Saddam Hussein to the attacks on the United States on 9/11/01. Secretary Donnie Dumbsfeld has appointed our country's most Elite Special Forces teams to assure this valuable documentation remains safe and away from the over analyzing 'Liberal Media' and for National Security Reasons (code-speak for something that needs to be covered up, so the population does not revolt).

This documentation is a personal letter from Saddam Hussein congratulating and thanking his Supreme Terror General, Osama bin Laden (also tucked away in Cheney's Bunker is evidence that bin Laden is dead, which is to be used when needed and pulled back if not needed), for a job well done. Though heavily disguised by being hand printed in crayon, Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary Donnie Dumbsfeld have authenticated the document by the emergency stove piping of it thru Intelligence and Defense Agencies. They have even had confirmation that the document is from Saddam, by allowing the document to be throughly analyzed by blogger specialists, who helped crack the Dan Rather (leftist/communist/terrist Michael Moore type) bogus (truth shredded) attack on our Glorious Commander Bush (actual story content irrelevant, the smear is what counts).

According to the Vice President, all will be fine and this document is the massive evidence that everyone seems to be concerned about missing. The Vice President and the Secretary assure the American People that all is well, to trust them to handle the situation to keep them (Cheney & Dumbsfeld) safe, and America had better not ever elect the Democratic Party to control any branch of the Government if Americans do not wish to be hit with the worst attack on American soil (Clinton was President, and after 9/11, George W. Bush rose out of the rubble to become our Glorious Commander In Chief to lead the nation into war. Please go cover your vehicle and home with flags and Bush/Cheney paraphernalia now.)

9/11? Well, since it is a matter of harming our National Security for the evidence to be presented to actually charge Saddam Hussein as being the mastermind behind 9/11, we'll just have to let all the other war crimes take care of his execution (that would be Saddam's war crimes, not BushCo's).

[CJCRANE]

18. Bin Laden is also not officially implicated in 9/11 either

if you look on the FBI website.

(Although he is implicated in the East Africa embassy bombings and attack on the USS Cole).