|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Mr. McD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 10:57 AM Original message |
Recruiting Rates Up Militarywide; Army Targets New Veterans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. What they don't mention is that they reduced their goal by 80% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Link for the 80% goal reduction? I don't believe your numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:09 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Do you not recognize sarcasm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:14 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. They have been forced by Congress. Congress won't support the troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:29 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. So, is your point that they haven't reduced recruitment goals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. My point is, the Army didn't reduce goals because they couldn't make them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 12:11 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Wrong again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
2. That is because the have lowered the standards for enlistment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. This is true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. I wonder how much they reduced their quotas to be able to meet.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. Not exactly true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. rule #2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Maybe they should lift the army's ban on masturbation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:16 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. They have been forced by Congress. Congress won't support the troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:34 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Didn't they increase # of troops by 80,000 this year?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
9. The Army should have no problem ever meetings its goals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-14-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Wow ! You're right ! I see those magnets everywhere ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC