montanacowboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:28 PM
Original message |
Will the Democrats call for Impeachment |
|
over *'s violation of the Constitution? he violated his oath to protect and defend -
there is no longer any question that he must be impeached - even the stupid bushbots have to realize this
this MUST become BIG -
How can we continue as a democracy with this kind of shitstorm? Impeach and Imprison all those who vioalate our constitutional rights
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Are you trying to undermine the preznent |
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It's a no-brainer, IMO! |
oldtime dfl_er
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Let's take back Congress |
|
THEN we can talk impeachment because it will be viable then. Get involved, stay involved, take back the House and the Senate in 2006.
|
ClassWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Only if we call for it first. |
|
Loudly and often.
Visualize IMPEACHMENT.
NGU.
|
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They would need to get some repugs to join them |
|
Or it will never go anywhere. They just don't have the numbers.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Perhaps Hagel could gather a few? |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-16-05 03:42 PM by mmonk
What mavericks do they have? None in the House I suppose.
|
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Not like Clinton, this time there is a good reason |
|
A fascist idiot pissing on the Constitution.
|
Democrats_win
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. It's just a piece of paper. You know, like bu$h's diploma/toilet paper. |
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. lying under oath- on something FAR more important than |
|
a sexual affair.-
bush swore-
""I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
what is his defense? that his abilities weren't that competent? If so- then he must step down. Is he NOT answerable to the CITIZENS of this nation? those of us who haven't got any lobbiests lining our pockets, or elections we want to 'guard'????
This is so frustrating- so incredibly frustrating.
|
reality based
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
7. If law and constitution are going to retain their traditional meaning |
|
in this country, this matter must be properly investigated and impeachment must follow provided the allegations are true. Otherwise, all bets are off. It's make or break time.
|
A Simple Game
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
10. No, the Democrats now in the House just don't have what |
|
it takes to call for impeachment.
Can't see it happening unless the public get much more vocal about it.
|
montanacowboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Then they better get what it takes |
|
and so should all the moderate repukes - surely they will need to answer to their constituency - surely there still remains a vestige of real patriotism among them -
If he gets away with this - kiss your asses goodbye for real
|
A Simple Game
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. I'm on your side, but how many times have I heard |
|
"If he gets away with this", only to see him "get away with it"?
|
mattclearing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Suspending the Constitution to spy on Americans is going to be |
|
a big deal. It totally shitcanned the PA reauthorization, and will likely be a large brick in the wall of Bush's demise.
|
texastoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Wouldn't that mean the Dems need some balls? |
|
I think they are lacking.
|
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
14. thank YOU- i've been saying |
|
the same thing for awhile- The "OATH" he took on his masonic bible- was exactly what he has violated- PRESERVE PROTECT and DEFEND- what? his cronies? big business? - our 'image'? NO- the CONSTITUTION-
If he hasn't lied under oath- then i don't know jack shit-
|
BrotherBuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Gerald Ford has the final word on this subject |
|
"An impeachable offence is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history." - Gerald Ford, 1970
We need to get to work and take back the house in 2006. Come, we have work to do.
|
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. you should go back and read what Henry Hyde |
|
said about why lying to the people of the nation is such a heinous crime- and requires impeachment- I just read it- we have a host of quotes by the 'impeachers' to throw back in their faces-
and not for a blow job, but for blowing up human beings, and our constitutional rights-
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |