eek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-20-03 02:37 PM
Original message |
just thunk of a LIHOP angle:why Saddam not osama |
|
It just occurred to me, as I was placing my tinfoil hat at a jaunty angle, that one of the reasons "we" went after S Hussein rather than O b Laden was because "we" would need to fall back on the services of Public Enemy #1 as the re-selection draws nearer.
In other words, if "we" haven't caught osama yet then he could strike again, causing "us" all to run back into the protective embrace of "our" "president."
|
nostamj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-20-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
1. "if" "he" "attacks" "again" |
|
"our" "president" will be "toast" for failing to protect the country...
if it happens, it won't be because anyone in the WH wants it
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message |