Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Were "Americans" being spied on or foreign nationals that live here?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:22 PM
Original message
Were "Americans" being spied on or foreign nationals that live here?
So If I called my Italian relatives over in Italy just to say hello does that mean that my conversation was of interest to NSA?

Democracy Now reported this morning it was overseas phone calls and emails that were spied upon.

The issue should be about an elected dictatorial Presidency violating established laws at will because if its about "he listened to my conversation" they win that argument because his defense would be that it was to defend against sleeper cells or another terrorist attack.

The FISA Law and Courts, established as a result of CIA domestic spying in the 1970's, was intended as a tool for just what this President is doing now yet he has gone around that law.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. What do you think?
Perhaps the leakers to the Times know more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I don't know what to think. I DO know that Bush is a dangerous person.
Edited on Mon Dec-19-05 12:32 PM by Postman
This morning on Democracy Now, Amy Goodman asked a question of one of her guests (I believe it may have been James Bamford) about what the effect that increased surveillance domestically would have on analysts at the NSA...

I loved the response.

He said, "if your job is to find a needle in a haystack you don't find it by adding more hay"

http://democracynow.org/index.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Probably both. Probably frequently. Probably an "enemies list"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. The people who know, aren't telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justabob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Citizens... and everyone else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. American Citizens.
And yes, there is a good likelihood that your conversation was at least scanned by a computer looking for key words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. doesn't matter!
it's just as illegal either way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. My bet is both
but will we ever know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. I guess I have to ask-how did they determine who was listened
to? Since I have a totally negative opinion of anything they do, I would bet the actual number of people was extremely high in the beginning then was weaned down. That is why I think they never went to the secret court, because they knew it would never approve such a random act of spying. We will never know because you can be sure all documents have been adequately destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think you probably are correct in your analysis...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. All communication is spied on - they claim speaker is identified only
on overseas phone calls and emails and then full scale eavesdropping is done on the identified person.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. domestic spying
No, that is just wrong. Bush was spying on US citizens' activities IN the US with absolutely no oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. well I hope "they" enjoyed listening to me making hotel reservations
and I hope they heard me telling my friend that I called while away overseas what was going on (B O R I N G as hell).

How disgusting, violating the rights of American citizens. There is no authority that allows such things as spying on American citizens, nothing.

Freaks. They'll all rot in hell, I do know that much.

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Original message
That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Original message
That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Original message
That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. That reminds me of when
my mother used to babysit for the kids of bigwigs in the Communist Party USA in the early 70s. I'm sure the FBI had a fine time trying to interpret what "Kim's bowel movements were a bit loose" meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I heard you the first time
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. both
I believe the prez said they were listening to international calls to and from us citizens and residents with alleged ties to al qaeda and affiliates. It would interesting to see the profile of what constitutes alleged ties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC