Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Dean: "Bush is the first president in history to publically admit..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:37 AM
Original message
John Dean: "Bush is the first president in history to publically admit..."
"To an IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE" as quoted by Senator Boxer.

She also said The Senat WILL Consider IMPEACHMENT SERIOUSLY.

This is on Tavis Smiley now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. If only there were a blow job involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yeah if it's not about sex the GOP don't care
We can be lied into a war, but if no sex is involved, they don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. You're giving the GOP too much credit. If chimpy got a blow
job and lied about it, you can damn well be sure the Repukes would be yammering on about 'personal privacy' and 'it's his own business'. They're not going to see one of their own subpoened, let alone impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogradda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah no kidding.
We'd hear screams of outrage over that no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. who was the DU poster with the sig that read, "will somebody PLEASE
give him a blowjob so we can impeach him already"? I really liked that one, and we had many discussions on who would be the sacrificial lamb.

several gay friends volunteered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. That would truly be well beyond the call of duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess so!!!
If we don't hold the rat bastard accountable we might as well call it a day. It'll be completely over for this country.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can't make up my mind if he's really that STUPID....or if he's really
that ARROGANT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. You don't have to choose --
he's both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. well,they damn well MUST begin impeachment proceedings!
he took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution and he went out and, excuse me, defacated all over it.


it reminds me of something i once heard a judge tell rapist cop right before sending him to prison: "You took an oath of office and you violated it for evil purposes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. Where is a link to Dean's actual words?
Sorry if this has already been asked and answered, but I've seen about 20 different postings that quote Boxer saying Dean says this, but I've not seen any direct link to Dean's words. Can someone oblige?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not sure, I just saw it on Tavis Smiley... no link yet, but I'll search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Here
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 01:07 AM by REP
http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/05/12/ale05173.htm

Boxer Asks Presidential Scholars about Former White House Counsel's Statement that Bush Admitted to an "Impeachable Offense"

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT

News from the Sen. Boxer's office:

Washington, D.C.– U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today asked four presidential scholars for their opinion on former White House Counsel John Dean’s statement that President Bush admitted to an "impeachable offense" when he said he authorized the National Security Agency to spy on Americans without getting a warrant from a judge.

Boxer said, "I take very seriously Mr. Dean's comments, as I view him to be an expert on Presidential abuse of power. I am expecting a full airing of this matter by the Senate in the very near future."

Boxer’s letter is as follows:

On December 16, along with the rest of America, I learned that President Bush authorized the National Security Agency to spy on Americans without getting a warrant from a judge. President Bush underscored his support for this action in his press conference today.


On Sunday, December 18, former White House Counsel John Dean and I participated in a public discussion that covered many issues, including this surveillance. Mr. Dean, who was President Nixon’s counsel at the time of Watergate, said that President Bush is “the first President to admit to an impeachable offense.” Today, Mr. Dean confirmed his statement.

This startling assertion by Mr. Dean is especially poignant because he experienced first hand the executive abuse of power and a presidential scandal arising from the surveillance of American citizens.

Given your constitutional expertise, particularly in the area of presidential impeachment, I am writing to ask for your comments and thoughts on Mr. Dean’s statement.

Unchecked surveillance of American citizens is troubling to both me and many of my constituents. I would appreciate your thoughts on this matter as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Barbara Boxer
United States Senator

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. You mean anal sex isn't impeachable???
* has been screwing the lot of us for 5 years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoveBlowsDogs Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. So then, if he pleads anything other than guilty
Would that make it perjury? (sp?)

That is, GWB came out and said that yes, he did precisely that criminal act in question (illegal wiretaps and its ilk) in a premeditated fashion. Ok, so now, since there is no question that this is a crime, if there is any justice left, he'll be tried, and at that time, does he have any choice but to admit guilt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. We have to take lessons from Germany
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 02:57 AM by loyalsister
And be very careful how we handle this.

The wisdom of Dr. Goerbels The bigger the lie the easier it is to get people to believe it."

We should be cautious and potentially find an analogy. "The bigger the crime the more likely they will forgive."

Here is why. A significant number of people trusted Bush to begin with for some strange reason. They believe he is sincere about his religious beliefs. People very often do not have the depth of awareness of government required to fully understand the delicate relationship between rights and security. I really worry that the people who are caught in the double whammy outnumber us. It will be hard for them to believe that Bush would commit a serious crime or tell a serious lie unless there was a good reason to do so. In that case, it just might be forgivable- because he truly was trying to keep us safe.
I think that this just something we have to overcome. If this actually does happen, we need to think about how to do that when talking with skeptics.
To extend my analogy, consider the fact that there is such a thing as "justifiable homicide." AND, it is on the agenda in the Missouri state legislature.

HB 1103 Jones, Kenny
Creates a presumption in certain circumstances that a person using deadly force has a reasonable fear of death or harm and allows that person immunity in certain circumstances for use of defensive force (LR# 3170L.01I)

SB 571 - Cauthorn - Modifies the law on using justifiable force to protect persons and property


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. Evidence that BUSH KNEW HE WAS BREAKING THE LAW and
GONZALES PLANNED TO LIE ABOUT IT:

he KNEW he was breaking the law - THIS THREAD HAS THE PROOF:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5643625
thread title (12/20 GD): April 2004: Bush tells audiences Wiretaps Require a Court Order

This was in April 2004, in a Q & A session. Here's an excerpt of what Bush said:


THE PRESIDENT: Let me -- that's a great question. A couple of things that are very important for you to understand about the Patriot Act. First of all, any action that takes place by law enforcement requires a court order. In other words, the government can't move on wiretaps or roving wiretaps without getting a court order.

Now, we've used things like roving wiretaps on drug dealers before. Roving wiretaps mean you change your cell phone. And yet, we weren't able to use roving wiretaps on terrorists. And so what the Patriot Act said is let's give our law enforcement the tools necessary, without abridging the Constitution of the United States, the tools necessary to defend America.


This does tend to support the idea that HE WANTED TO SHUT DOWN THE NYT ARTICLE …
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5641346
thread title (12/19 GD): BREAKING: SHRUB MET WITH NYT EDITORS IN LAST-DITCH EFFORT TO STOP SPYGATE
BECAUSE HE KNEW HE HAD BROKEN THE LAW AND HIS OATH OF OFFICE.

Furthermore, as this fine American Progress compilation on Spygate shows, Gonzales appears to have lied - under oath -about exactly this sort of extralegal Presidential caper in his Jan 2005 confirmation hearings:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5643708
thread title (12/20 GD): AmProg"The Truth About Bush's Warrantless Spying" (& Gonzo planned to LIE)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. Open memo to Jimmy Jeff GannonGuckert
Come on Jeffy....

You know you did him. We know you did him. Come out with the story, for your country's sake and all will be forgiven.

Well, except that horrible crap you called "Journalism". It would be asking too much to excuse that. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Schrub probably didn't even realize it when he admitted it
IMPEACH BUSH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. He'll probably claim he did NOT have a lawyer present!
LOL
What can we expect from a just dept that says the Geneva Convention is quaint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC