|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Plaid Adder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:24 AM Original message |
Can we run Barbara Boxer instead of Hillary in 2008? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. More and More I feel she has the balls to win that thing. More than Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
3. a much better choice n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yes...if we want to lose 40 states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyS40 (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
60. If you're right she could never win the nomination anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
5. she has the ability to run. i would choose her over hillary in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woodsprite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
6. She'd have mine and hubby's vote in a primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud_Lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
7. Boxer is amazing and can win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:37 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Could you explain how Senator Boxer can win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud_Lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 12:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Swing voters are rapidly swinging to the left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Swing voters are swinging left...but not by much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud_Lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Did Bush initially run on a promise not to get blow jobs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:18 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Listen, I LOVE Senator Boxer, she's a great Senator and I admire her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #43 |
51. All ran against well-entrenched Republicans with strong admins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyS40 (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
64. McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis weren't Boxer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kralizec (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. Boxer had very strong ties to John F. Kennedy. It's this type of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. 'Um...okay, let's see if I understand WHAT you're saying here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kralizec (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. I vote on principle when I can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. I only asked you to explain the JFK comment, geez n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. For that matter how would Hillary play outside of NY and CA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:35 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Re-read the last few words of my post number 10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 04:22 PM Response to Reply #27 |
89. Not around these parts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
72. Kerry most Liberal Presidential Candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:09 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. John Edwards can fight like a junkyard dog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:13 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. I'll meet you and anti |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:20 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Okay...we'll meet halfway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
8. Yes, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
9. I'm hearin' what you're sayin'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
11. Happily. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cry baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
12. That would be my fondest wish! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
13. See, NOBODY will give a reason why they think Boxer would be a good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. there are some I would discuss this with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. And why would that be may I ask? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kralizec (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:14 PM Response to Reply #29 |
42. Anytime you make your point they start ignoring you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:21 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. This is how we feel too...anytime we try to point out the logic that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:31 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I will say it once, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Look, here's the deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Yes, which is why I supported Wesley Clark and John Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyS40 (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
69. I can give a reason, and have given it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
14. she has my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
15. and my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
16. Feingold/Boxer? Or Boxer/Feingold? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kliljedahl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. That combo works for me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
48. Ditto! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 04:20 PM Response to Reply #16 |
87. I'm good with that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. I'll sign on to that :^D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
19. HELL yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Protagoras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
20. 100% more inspired to support Boxer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libodem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
21. Plaid, you are brilliant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kralizec (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. I'd vote for Boxer with pride, Hillary with shame. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kralizec (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
24. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
25. I'd enthusiastically vote for Boxer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
32. I would love Barbara to run, but I don't think she will be considered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
35. Barbara Boxer is not electable in a national election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. but with Boxer we have a chance at winning Calif. and N.Y. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. But we ALWAYS win California and New York...at least we have done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. But you think Hillary will? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:31 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. Read my comment in post number 10 in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:54 PM Response to Reply #59 |
71. Landrieu.?? are you kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Hey I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:20 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Boxer would get stomped in a national election. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MN ChimpH8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
36. Barbara Boxer ROCKS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
40. Feingold-Boxer works for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mimitabby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
41. YES!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LunaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
46. I'll jump on the Boxer Bandwagon ANY day! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
50. Honey, sign me up for that campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
53. Absolutely! Boxer '08! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Township75 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
57. No! Hillary has the name recognition, Zaz, Big Dog, Wow-factor,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
58. I would support Boxer 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
61. YES YES YES!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Anybody for Edwards/Boxer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
63. Fine With Me (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrotherBuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
65. Just as soon as we Californians redefine the meaning of Favorite Son.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
66. Can we just run someone that can WIN on a national level. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 03:36 PM Response to Reply #66 |
84. Here's a fact: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
67. go barbara!!! go home hilary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
68. In a heartbeat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
70. Absolutely. Boxer represents us, Hillary is Chamber of Commerce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
74. YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ornotna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
78. Count me in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandyky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
79. I wish! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndreaCG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
80. Sounds good to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
81. She has my approval!! Go BOXER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
82. She has my approval!! Go BOXER! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
83. I'm with you PA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
85. What? Run a full-time Democrat instead of a part-timer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
86. Boxer or Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
88. I'm with you, completely. Here's a ticket no one has mentioned; Gore/Boxer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
90. Boxer is great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithnotgreed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
91. count me in most definitely - recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC