Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators seek probe of Bush's spying orders!!! - THIS IS HUGH!!11 -Enjoy!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:18 PM
Original message
Senators seek probe of Bush's spying orders!!! - THIS IS HUGH!!11 -Enjoy!
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 03:34 PM by stop the bleeding
Saw this in the LBN thought you all would like to chew on this...also I did not see it here yet - sorry if it has already been posted here.

Enjoy and let the games begin


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Rebuffing assurances from President George W. Bush, bipartisan members of the U.S. Senate's Intelligence Committee called on Tuesday for an immediate inquiry into his authorization of spying on Americans.
But Vice President Dick Cheney predicted a backlash against critics of the administration's anti-terrorism policies as he forcefully defended a program that critics say may have exceeded Bush's powers.

Republican Sens. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Olympia Snowe of Maine joined Democratic Sens. Carl Levin of Michigan, Dianne Feinstein of California and Ron Wyden of Oregon in calling for a joint investigation by the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary Committees into whether the government eavesdropped "without appropriate legal authority."

Several Republican and Democratic lawmakers have raised questions about whether spying on Americans violates the U.S. Constitution and have already backed a plan for a congressional hearing into the program, first revealed by The New York Times last week.


Continued ...

  • Senators seek probe of Bush's spying orders- Reuters



  • Go here if you would like to do something or show support:
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5645288&mesg_id=5645288

    Go here if you would like to know the real question that should be at the top of the MSM and not the shit that is being shoveled around:
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5647735&mesg_id=5647735
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
    ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:22 PM
    Response to Original message
    1. Articles of Impeachment...A First Draft
    Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 04:04 PM by ddeclue
    Everyone:

    Please send the below to your Congressmen and Senators (and newspapers) and ask them if they could please take the time to fill in the blanks.

    Write your Congressman here:
    http://www.house.gov/writerep /

    Look up and write your Senators here:
    http://www.senate.gov /

    It is surprising how little editing was required to go from the original Richard Nixon Articles of Impeachment to the below. It only took about 10 minutes.

    http://watergate.info/impeachment/impeachment-articles....

    Doug De Clue
    Orlando, FL

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Articles of Impeachment Adopted by the Committee on the Judiciary

    Date:______________

    Article 1
    Article 2
    Article 3

    RESOLVED, That George W. Bush, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:

    ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

    Article 1

    In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:

    On or about December 17, 2005, and prior thereto, agents of the National Security Agency on orders of George W. Bush committed unlawful warrentless wiretaps against thousands of American citizens inside the United States in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (USC Title 50 Chapter 36 Subchapter 1), and in engaged in a conspiracy with him to commit an offense against the United States in violation of USC TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 19 § 371. Prior thereto, George W. Bush, using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his close subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such illegal activities; to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible; and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities in violation of USC TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1512 paragraph (b).

    The means used to implement this course of conduct or plan included one or more of the following: issuing Executive Orders contrary to United States Code, making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States; withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States; approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings; interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Congressional Committees; endeavouring to misuse the National Security Agency, an agency of the United States; and making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements.

    In all of this, George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

    Wherefore George W. Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

    Adopted ____ to ____ by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, at __________________________________, in Room ______ of the _____________ Office Building, Washington D.C.

    Article 2

    Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies.

    This conduct has included one or more of the following:

    He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the National Security Agency, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, the contents of private phone calls for purposes not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, criminal investigations to be intitiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.

    He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Security Agency and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes not authorized by law, or any lawful function of his office; he did direct, authorize, or permit the use of information obtained thereby; and he did direct the concealment of certain records made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency of electronic surveillance.

    He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, authorized and permitted to be maintained a secret investigative unit within the offices of the Department of Defense, which unlawfully utilized the resources of the government, and engaged in covert and unlawful activities to unlawfully gather intelligence in violation of domestic prohibitions.

    He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful naming of a covert operative of the Central Intelligence Agency, and the cover-up thereof.

    In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

    In all of this, George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

    Wherefore George W. Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.


    Adopted ____ to ____ by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.


    Article 3

    In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, George W. Bush, contrary to his oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has through the use of often-secret Justice Department findings, substituted his own judgment for that of the courts assuming to himself functions and judgments necessary to the proper exercise of the judicial power vested by the Article III of the Constitution in the Supreme Court and the lower Courts established by Congress.

    In all of this, George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice, and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

    Wherefore, George W. Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

    Adopted ____ to ____ by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:39 PM
    Response to Reply #1
    7. a little early but I like your line of thinking
    there's gonna be alot of push back over this

    My Senator, Levin, was on the Paul Harvey show here locally this morning. Paul was bringing up that stupid eschalon program from 2000. But Levin kept going back to the President and saying that the president says he had the authority but doesn't cite the law. Harvey comes back with, well I don't know the specific law either but...Levin cuts him off and because there is none. There's only the FISA law which requires a court order within 72hours of the spying. So I wonder how much data Karl collected to understand and weaken the progressive opposition?
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:49 PM
    Response to Reply #7
    8. Tell him the law is the law is the law...
    The just because the other Presidents were doing it excuse doesn't wash.

    If Clinton did it (which I doubt) then Clinton needs to be charged too.

    Listening in without a warrant isn't just impolite, it's a felony.

    www.brainshrub.com/president-wiretap

    Doug De Clue
    Orlando, FL
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:53 PM
    Response to Reply #7
    9. As for the Articles of Impeachment...
    I think it will have great shock value on the Congress if they get this in large numbers because it was adapted from the Richard Nixon articles relatively painlessly and quickly and it will put the idea up front where every body can see it and where Congress knows we are paying attention.

    I think in that regard it's not too early at all. We have a President who just confessed to whole series of felonies on national TV.

    "Listening in without a warrant isn't just impolite, it's a felony"

    www.brainshrub.com/president-wiretap

    Doug De Clue
    Orlando, FL

    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:24 PM
    Response to Original message
    2. "...my guess is..."
    "And I don't think that there is anything improper or inappropriate in that and my guess is that the vast majority of the American people support that, support what we're doing, believe we ought to be doing it," he said."

    Mr. Cheney, you evil, evil bastard, you don't have to guess. There is no guesswork involved. Read the polls. You can guess all you want, as I suppose it relieves you of having to rely on actual data, but the fact is, the American people DO NOT back you up on this. Stop guessing with our lives and freedoms. This isn't YOUR country, it's ours, you fascist fuckwad!
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:25 PM
    Response to Original message
    3. It's about time these GOPsters get there act together!!!!
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:30 PM
    Response to Original message
    4. I have made a few updates to the original post --- n/t
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:31 PM
    Response to Original message
    5. stop the bleeding:
    Please be aware that DU copyright rules require that excerpts of copyrighted material be limited to four paragraphs and must include a link to the original source.

    In the future, please insure your posts adhere to this standard.

    TIA,

    unhappycamper
    DU Moderator
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:33 PM
    Response to Reply #5
    6. I am fixing the post - taking out paragraphs - link was at the bottom of
    Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 03:36 PM by stop the bleeding
    story - sorry about the rules. I guess I have a long way to go before I make mod status???

    Thanx for keeping DU running smooth
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:30 PM
    Response to Reply #6
    13. Naaaaaah
    Almost anybody can become a mod. . . . B-)
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:57 PM
    Response to Original message
    10. The letter was posted
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5647819

    Apparently some people won't support it because it has the name Feinstein attached. Then those same people will whine 2 weeks from now about the spineless Dems, when the truth is they didn't support this investigation because it wasn't led by one of the cool kids.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    QuettaKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:58 PM
    Response to Reply #10
    11. KICK...nt.
    .
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:00 PM
    Response to Reply #10
    12. I found that thread well after my posting - my bad- I did nominate though
    :spank:
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:41 PM
    Response to Reply #12
    14. I was just sayin'
    Nothing against you. It's frustrating whenever things don't get the attention they deserve, I agree.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:44 PM
    Response to Reply #14
    15. I know - It just that I am kicking myself for dividing up our efforts -
    If i would have paid better attention then people would not have to divide up their attention to multiple threads, and I know what you mean when people do not support but then turn around and ask WTF about the DEM support or lack there of.
    Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
     
    DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:02 AM
    Response to Original message
    Advertisements [?]
     Top

    Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

    Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
    Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


    Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

    Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

    About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

    Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

    © 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC