|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Maine-ah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:55 PM Original message |
Clinton illegally wire tapped? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's already been debunked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. In orther words: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. It puts you on the defense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinbgoode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Isn't it always Clinton's fault? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. Do you mean he authorized wiretaps, or that he WAS tapped? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine-ah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. as in he was tapping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
5. Make them PROVE it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Yep, that's the standard response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
6. Tell them this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. Is it even relevant to this president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. I agree. I'm so sick and tired of these repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. I think it should read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Exactly. Linda Tripp was an illegal wire tapper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. sure he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
13. Well, Not According To Peter King |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yeah so... and Nixon wiretapped too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
15. Its false, but so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maine-ah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
18. great thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chabs39 (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
19. meh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FearofFutility (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-20-05 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
20. I would say to him or her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC