cantstandbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-20-05 08:47 PM
Original message |
So, if Bush hadn't broke the law there wouldn't have been a leak? |
|
Isn't Bush to blame for the damage done to this spying operation?
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-20-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
1. He's to blame alright! |
rustydog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-20-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The Times planned to run the story Dec 6th! Bush hounded |
|
them trying to kill the story.
Are those the actions of an innocent man?
|
cantstandbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. The Times was only running the story because the taps were illegal. n/t |
BuyingThyme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message |
4. To me, exposing fascism just ain't a "leak." |
cantstandbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message |
5. So what I am really saying is that Bush has endangered America because |
|
of his illegal, warrantless wiretaps.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |