Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CLINTON DID NOT ORDER WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF AMERICAN CITIZENS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:24 AM
Original message
CLINTON DID NOT ORDER WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF AMERICAN CITIZENS
CLINTON DID NOT ORDER WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF AMERICAN CITIZENS
Here's what Clinton signed:


Section 1. Pursuant to section 302(a)(1) <50 U.S.C. 1822(a)> of the Act, the Attorney General is authorized to approve physical searches, without a court order, to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year, if the Attorney General makes the certifications required by that section.

You don't have to be a lawyer to understand that Clinton allowed warrantless searches if and only if the AG followed section 302(a)(1). What does section 1822(a) require?


the "physical search is solely directed at premises, information, material, or property used exclusively by, or under the open and exclusive control of, a foreign power or powers." Translation: You can't search American citizens.

and there is "no substantial likelihood that the physical search will involve the premises, information, material, or property of a United States person." Translation: You can't search American citizens.


Moreover, Clinton's warrant waiver consistent with FISA refers only to physical searches. "Physical searches," as defined by 1821(5), exclude electronic surveillance.
http://www.dailykos.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R... I heard this nonsense as well from freeperland...
They are getting desperate if they use the "Buh, buh, buh CLINTON" excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This was the lead talking point on Rush on Monday
Kicked and recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. Also, if Clinton did it, as a right-wingnut, shouldn't you do the opposite
?

If Clinton was so awful, wouldn't you want to do the opposite of what he did and not use his behavior as justification for your own behavior? According to their logic, we shouldn't impeach Shrub if he gets a blowjob from an intern, because, well, Clinton did it first!

??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. OK, I'll Post This One More Time
Peter King (R-NY) said he SHOULD HAVE and that would have prevented 9/11. So, what we've got here is conservatives saying "Clinton did it too, but because he didn't we had 9/11, which wouldn't have happened if he had spied, but he didn't, even though he did."

That's how much sense this whole thing means.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yes I love that rationalization
Bill Clinton, the worst most evil power hungry, Big Government controling your lives, wants to set Big Brother on all us freedom loving Americans and take away ours guns President did it.

Therefore it's okay that the wonderful, God-fearing Son of man, George Bush did it.

It's too bad they haven't found out George Bush cheated on his wife with an intern in the Oval Office.

The flip-flopping rationalization on that would be truly mind-bending.

They'd probably settle on Bill CLinton made him cheat on his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Thx Professor
for putting that into perspective. I was confused....

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. But Bill Clinton is not a Christian and Jesus did not pick him
Bill Clinton let the queers into the military and Bill Clinton helped mastermind 9/11.

That's what my church told me.



Point being you see it doesn't matter what Clinton did or didn't do he is bad and Bush is a Godly good man and no matter what Bush does he is right because Jesus handpicked him to be president......apparently Bush is fluent in Arameic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. that red haired freak vickie toensing on c-span yesterday LIED
what a surprise!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. An MSNBC analyst did not know the answer to the question...
of whether Clinton did, or did not. They have succeeded in muddying the waters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. The "Clinton did it too" (even though wrong) Defense is just so pathetic
So after all these years of of "bringing honor and integirty to the white house" BS they have to resort to "Clinton Did it Too" defense even though it is wrong factually. P-a-t-h-e-t-i-c.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. From CNN
BLITZER: And just after the interview, we contacted the former deputy attorney general under Bill Clinton, Jamie Gorelick. She said she didn't know what Senator Cornyn was talking about. She went on to say this and she gave us this statement -- "During the Clinton administration, the Justice Department sought from Congress the extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, FISA, to include physical searches. Congress granted that authority. The Justice Department did not seek authority to wiretap without a warrant."

And Jamie Gorelick went on to say this. She said that as an employee of the Justice Department, she never asked for authority to obtain a warrantless wiretap.

We'll go back to Senator Cornyn and get his update, to see if he has a different recollection, or if he has different information than what Jamie Gorelick has just told us.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/12/21/8157/6595
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is important to debunk
because the wingnuts are all calling into talk shows, repeating that Clinton and Carter did this.

How does this crap get started??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. RW radio
that is the whole point of RW talk radio.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. white house fax machine
would be my best guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. VIDEO -Hardball/Mitchell debunks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. On Fox they said Carter did it too
No details in the news report just one of the morning personalities making the statement that apparantly Carter and Clinton did it to (funny though no mention of Reagan or Bush 1).

These guys can split hairs as well as the best 5 year old.

If only Clinton and Carter had jumped off a bridge when they were President, then George woulda have to as well.

Regarding Carter they said he authorized it for a 1 year period. For Clinton they said he did it for 1 guy Aldrich Ames.

Even in those scant details they reveal how differant what they are saying Clinton and Carter did from what the current President is doing since he seems to have claimed the authority to do it to any one at any time for any reason for as long as he wanted to as long as he felt he was protecting Americans. It's the differance between the considerred exercise of executive authority and the blatant miss-use of executive authority.

This was confirmed by Cheney who admitted that he feels that the President does not have enough power and should have more going so far as to claim what was done after Nixon was actually unconstitutional (fine time to speak up about it now Mr. C).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Notice how they talk about Clinton then Carter and totally bypassed
Bush I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Dumbest. Argument. Ever.
Didn't shrub run on "restoring honor and dignity to the White House" in 2000? How the hell is using the "Clinton did it" excuse even remotely dignified? If Clinton had conducted human sacrifices in front of the Washington monument, would that mean it was okay for W to hold them, too? Sheesh--talk about wanting to have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. another link refuting this,in regards to Drudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm kicking this.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. A kick for the truth
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rg302200 Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bush and Cheney are forgetting someone....
and that someone is Richard M. Nixon who dirtied his hands trying to get information on Dem's. One wonders if these A-holes have ever read a history book. Did they learn nothing from Nixon's mistakes??

Executive power was eroded after Nixon because he was a screwup who abused his power for his own personal gain. Does that sound like Bush or what?

Lets hope he follows Nixon's path to a tee and leaves the whitehouse...for good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. so, help me out here
I'm trying to explain this, and this is what this guy said to me....

the "physical search is solely directed at premises, information, material, or property used exclusively by, or under the open and exclusive control of, a foreign power or powers." Translation: You can't search American citizens.


Aldrich Ames was an American Citizen. Hmmmmmm did Clinton pull trick on you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. kicking, I need an answer about Aldrich Ames
I have googled, and am currently reading about him, but if anyone has some insite that would be great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I suspect that anyone with that type of top secret security clearance
gives permission to the goverment to come on their property without a warrant. I can't imagine being high up at the Agency and not be subject to surprise spot checks.

But I really don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. Discussion on Dan Abrams now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC