Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone Needs to Review the List of Names Involved in the Intercepts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Whiskey Priest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:16 AM
Original message
Someone Needs to Review the List of Names Involved in the Intercepts.
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 11:16 AM by The Whiskey Priest
FISA provided the Republicans with a 72 hour opportunity to go to the FISA court after-the-fact. So, the defense that they had to act quickly does not hold water. The only thing that would make sense for doing the intercepts in secrecy would be that there are people who are in no way connected with terrorist that were subjected to illegal intercepts.

I would wager that what we have is Nixon’s enemies list again and not some over-zealousness to protect the American people from harm. This would be much in line with the Republicans philosophy of using the government against the people and not for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's a list!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Of course there is a list. But it isn't subject to the FOIA. So don't
hold your breath. Not if you value living, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. detection versus monitoring
The whole detection versus monitoring thing had left me with the impression that NSA was doing blanket interceptions (e.g., all calls to Pakistan), not necessarily confining themselves to a particular list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not confining themselves to a list, no - but do they keep records of the
intercepts? You bet they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe that was tried during the Bolton nomination hearings
and the WH blocked the release of some of them. Granted it wasn't all of them but seems to me that there were a hint of speculation the the Dem's had an idea as to who some of those intercepts involved. Now's a real good time to revisit that issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I assumed Bolton was connected to plame
that is why they held blocked requests for information.

So what if they tapped Wilson/Plame as one of the names on the list.

Wilson called over seas did he not?


If they can out a CIA agent and say they didn't "mean" to do it, but then piss and moan when someone leaks intell on them. That's Karma baby, heres to hoping it keeps on giving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not as concerned about Ambassador Wilson,
I've been firmly convinced from the discussions here that the true target of this whole scandal was actually Valerie Plame herself and her role with Brewster-Jennings. She was the WMD expert who potentially causes the most problems for this administration.

And yes I absolutely firmly believe John Bolton is up to eyeballs in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'd wager that 2004 Presidential candidates and their staffs
are on that list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC