Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 06:56 PM
Original message |
How come there are no ex-gay dating services? |
|
Everything else ex-gay is out there, but why not dating services?
I remember when hetero women, on an internet chat site, were pretending to be men and saying some choice x-rated phrases then say later how they were women. Have times changed; it seems nobody wants to care about changin' homos where it REALLY counts: Personal involvement.
(maybe it's also why bisexuals can't get a date from either side too. ;) :think: )
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Because, I suspect, ex-gays... |
|
are ex-gays in name only. Their desires don't change, but self-hate can get you to do some really stupid shit.
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. What isn't stupid shit these days? |
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
and the only way I've ever known it to work is when the "hetero" couple are both gay and marry just to produce children and raise them in an Ozzie and Harriet family while they date outside the marriage according to their preferences.
This whole thing is beyond silly. That such a minor and absolutely normal variation in human sexuality should cause such an uproar is beyond me. Of course, they're also very upset with women who let men do "that" to them, so I guess it's all tied in together with a real problem with sex, in general.
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
3. they marry decent christian wimmen provided by their "saviors" |
|
cause if they don't get em some ***** right away they might revert.
and of course if they revert the ex-gay ministries cannot
MAKE $$$$ off these people
because they are all about the money!
Msongs www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |