Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

rush was in fine form today...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:13 PM
Original message
rush was in fine form today...
he said the judge who resigned may have been the person who leaked the whole spying story..well maybe-hint-hint. gee rush, do you think maybe you should`t be attacking a judge when you`re facing drug charges? he also had some dope on saying it was ok to spy without warrants because it would take to much time to get one....rush- most people in the country have watched the da`s on law and order track down judges to get them to sign. actually the secret court have a stack of presigned warrants and they just fill in the blanks and there is no "long review" of any warrants. once again rush never fails to amaze me..those two brilliant statements were all within 5 minutes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh, how could that judge have been the leaker?
The Propagandist had BYPASSED the FISA court!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Plus the NYTimes has been sitting on it for a year. or more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheGunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Goes to show how incredibly stupid Rush is and anyone that believes him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Take too much time to get a warrant??
The 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows a President to order a wiretap, and THEN seek court permission. Forget the crap that's shown on TV. The law proves the lie.

It chagrins me to no end when Rush pointedly fails to tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Rush knows his dittoheads very well
They are stupid and will believe anything he says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why don't you call in and refute him...
oh, right, he doesn't talk to people who disagree with him. Too spineless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Todd B Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. You'd also think that..
..he wouldn't take bad about the ACLU while he's being represented by them, but that hasn't happened. Rush is just a blowhard - I laugh at the drones that call in in admiration of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. gee, rush, since you have nothing to hide
why did you fight against the prosecutor's warrent to look into your drug abuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Freepers, If you need someone to think for you, at least pick someone
with something to think with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, it's okay to spy on people without
getting a warrant? Then why has it taken, how many years, for the Prosecutor to get Rush's medical records? Why is Rush fighting that if it's okay to spy on the American people because it takes too much time to get a warrant?

I know it's useless to ask, but is there even one of his ditto-heads who might wonder why Rush would have on someone who is basically saying that Rush is wrong to insist on his 4th Amendment rights?

I wonder if it's possible to get past his screeners and ask that simple question? I'd love to hear his answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC