Breaking: U.S. and British Kings may share the same name:

[rzemanfl]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051223/wl_uk_afp/britainroyalcharles

[DavidDvorkin]

1. He doesn't want to be King Arthur?

I suppose some people would want him to be Arthur II.

[Marr]

8. King Arthur would be fantastic.

Hahaha.

[Connie_Corleone]

2. I thought it was about Bush and Blair.

Anyway, the United States already has a King George, so Charles has to pick another name.

[rzemanfl]

4. Nah! The can add something on the end to distinguish between

the two, like "the jug-eared." No that won't work. Dubyah can be "George the Unworthy" and Charles can be "George the Tampon guy" or something like that.

[tularetom]

3. What name?

"Inbred moran member of the lucky sperm club who got where he is because of who his parents were?"

[rzemanfl]

5. No, that's the "King" part. n/t

[Greeby]

6. At least with the Monarchy

That's how it's supposed to work

[Jed Dilligan]

7. Good, he doesn't deserve to share a name with Charles II.

German-assed pretender...

[gorbal]

9. Two Georges in power again, that would be interesting

This time it's the american one that's mad.

[MisterP]

10. Charles II "was nicknamed 'The Merry Monarch' because of" his mistresses

and Chucky's point being...?

[Jed Dilligan]

11. The 17th Century Clinton...

One of England's most beloved kings, known for private mischief but a great leader who brought the country back from Cromwell's reign of terror and made it prosper.