QuidditchFan
(299 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:28 PM
Original message |
|
I think that Kerry and Dean would both make good presidents.
Flame away. ;-)
|
indigo32
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
GOPBasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
Melinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Of course, damned near ANYTHING would be an improveemnt from the Orwellian Reign of Emperor Bunnypants*.
|
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Dean and Kerry for Co-President!
Here's the thing about all of our candidates:
ANY of them would make a fine president, and any of them would do the job infinately better than Bush.
|
Clete
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
salin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
8. How Dare you not participate |
|
in the practice of selecting a single candidate - supporting him/her blindly and bashing others reflexively?
I actually think that we have a fine crop of candidates - from which a number would make a strong candidate and an even stronger president.
|
QuidditchFan
(299 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. And if we don't close ranks around the eventual winner.... |
|
My greatest fear is that we won't be able to as effectively evangelicize for the eventual winner of the nomination.
It is going to be so critical for all Democrats to enthusiastically support, with both their wallets and their time, whatever candidate emerges from process.
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
bill clinton was my second choice in '92. he was okay, wasn't he? (LOL! he was fantastic!)
|
salin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. to me, you are preaching to the choir |
|
the divisions are going to be hard to heal. Folks don't realize that it will take more than "going to the poll and holding my nose and voting" for any of these candidates to win. It will take our $ and it will take us volunteering at the local level to participate in efforts to take the fight to the one on one level. The dems will NOT be able to out media spin the media and GOP $$$s. It will take quick organizing - and lots of one on one conversations to combat the silliness that the right is going to throw. If we are too divided we will have a hard time pulling together at the level that is needed to oust bush.
|
Sean Reynolds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:50 PM
Response to Original message |
poskonig
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-27-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We're in good shape whether we get Kerry-Edwards or Dean-Clark.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message |