info being
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-03 04:47 PM
Original message |
Plan for Bush to win in 2004 |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-28-03 04:49 PM by info being
Yesterday, I was thinking the unthinkable. Assuming the Bushies may have been capable of allowing 9/11 to happen, what else might they be capable of? As election season comes around and they get more desperate, what is their next move? In 2000 it was simple...tamper with ballots in Florida and use the chaos to push through more electronic voting machines. Then in 2002, it was also simple...knock off Paul Wellstone and then manufacture an "outrage" about his funeral (never quite understood that one). 2 for 2.
So what could they do next year? Worst case scenario...one in which we are all SCREWED, would be to manufacture a terrorist act and blame in on American Liberals. I don't recall a liberal ever being involved in such a thing (no Tim MacVey's on our side)...but if they could manufacture something they could once and for all make us into the traitors and terrorists they claim we are. And, of course, under the Patriot Act, anybody with any liberal affiliations could be detained.
That's how close we are to pure single-party rule and Fascism. To stand a chance, we have to convince the American people that these terrorists in Washington are capable of this sort of thing. If we fail to do that my next summer, we should be very afraid. But our odds don't look good...seeing how most the people even at DU don't see it.
|
Fish Eye
(193 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I hate to wake you up but.. |
|
we do have single party representation it is called capitalism. there is only one force of power and that is money and the power goes to those who control the money.
you really think YOUR vote counts...hahahahahahahahahahahahaahah
we have already been screwed and WE paid for it!
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I believe that's spelled... |
info being
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-03 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I was trying to be less radical...but I agree with you.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-03 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It won't be nearly that difficult for them. |
|
Diebold has spread far & wide. When its CEO offers to do everything he can to help deliver electoral votes to *, we are screwed.
They will no longer have to address the opposition. When machines re-elect you automatically, you are not accountable to the voters, and they become so much cannon fodder for your crusades.
|
hackwriter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-28-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
They won't have to do anything that drastic. The groundwork has already been laid for at least 80% of the voting machines to be rigged in their favor.
What will happen is either there will be no exit polls, or the data won't be released -- similar to what happened in 2002 -- because the exit polls will be so out of whack with the election result, and the official story will be that the exit polling methods were wrong, and the computer doesn't lie. :(
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |