Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

al-Qaida, Saddam Loyalists, Foreign Fighters...Who is to Blame??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 01:02 PM
Original message
al-Qaida, Saddam Loyalists, Foreign Fighters...Who is to Blame??
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 01:03 PM by leftchick
....after reading this article I am convinced our clueless leaders have not considered the fact that the continued attacks in Iraq could be from ALL of the above.....

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=540&ncid=736&e=10&u=/ap/20031031/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_who_s_responsible

Who's Behind Iraq Attacks Up For Debate

<snip>

A senior U.S. counterterrorism official said Thursday that use of those explosives, which the official said were traced to a manufacturer outside Iraq, pointed to possible al-Qaida involvement.


U.S. forces have seized large caches of plastic explosives among the munitions believed left over from Saddam's rule, indicating that they could have come from undetected Iraqi supplies.

On Thursday, U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton told the British Broadcasting Corp., that U.S. commanders believe "elements of the previous ... regime" have linked up with "international terrorists" to strike at U.S. and coalition forces.

Bolton added the attacks "demonstrated to many Iraqis that they are being used by al-Qaida and other terrorist groups ..."

References to attacks in Baghdad and the name al-Qaida suggest a link with Osama bin Laden (news - web sites)'s terror network. That link resonates among Americans scarred by the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks but increasingly skeptical of the U.S. role in Iraq.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. We're seeing unlikely alliances forming against . . .
. . . a "common enemy" - namely, US.

It's like the Catholics, Protestants, fundies, etc. uniting against abortion. Fundies think Catholics are all going straight to hell, but they'll pray with them at an anti-abortion rally and donate money together to fight abortion.

I think these alliances will actually GROW, rather than diminish with time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. The US is to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not only has Bush united totally disparate groups of terrorist groups...
but if we look at what is happening in the economic and political side of the world, he has united:

the EU and China who have agreed to have stronger economic ties

the Central and South American countries against the US's interference in their country's economies, etc.

Russia and the EU with Russia's consideration to changing to the euro re oil

Bush is definitely a uniter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's easy to hate the US,
and in Iraq it's easy to take pot shots at their representatives and friends. No wonder it's so popular. Solution: make love, not war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Saudi Arabia
Will NEVER let a truly democratic Arab state touch their border.
Of course the BFEE already must know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another Gem from Rummy the Dummy.....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3232807.stm

<snip>At a Pentagon news conference this week, the US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, argued that it was too early to conclude - as United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan had suggested - that this was a new phase in the campaign.

"It may be an isolated spike, it may have to do with Ramadan, it may have to do with an increase that will continue... none of us can predict the future," he said.

....Oh yeah? Well shit for brains, WE all predicted this would happen if you invaded Iraq!
This piece from the BBC really nails the inept ones in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sheesh
// none of us can predict the future," he said. // I have about 100 files from before the war ...that pridicted exactly this scenario...I'd just be preaching to the choir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC