Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who has the best shot of pulling in non-voters?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:35 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who has the best shot of pulling in non-voters?
Vote. And then tell us WHY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dean...already is doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Ditto
Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Roger that
easily 30% of any Meetup crowd is composed of outside the current narrow spectrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. He has repeatedly stated how many new voters he is
bringing on board. Is there any support for this statement? Also, are the new voters in red or blue states? I've noticed that a lot of Dean's campaign is based on trying to repeat a statement often enough that people take if for fact. (Hmmm.. sound familiar?) Plus the NAACP is pushing voter registration, as well as supporters of other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xJlM Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
38. All those confederate flag guys?
Yeah, right. And he was the only candidate to vote against the IWR too, wasn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IranianDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clark or Dean NOT KUCINICH.
I don't know what the guy who voted for Kucinich was thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. what exactly is your problem with Kucinich?
What are YOU thinking? Wait, should I really GAS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I vote : The Undertaker
Or some famous Nascar driver
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. obviously...
you should vote the tenth choice. Please do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kamika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. i did
*cough*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dean or Clark
Outsiders such as them always draw large numbers of non-voters. Clinton did it, Carter did it, and as much as I hate to say it, Reagan did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Facts Are Stubborn Things
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 05:15 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Voter Participation declined in 1976 (Carter) and 1980 (Reagan)....


Voter participation increased in 92 but we did have a third party candidate who spent approximately $70,000,000.00 and garnered damn near twenty percent of the popular vote....


http://www.multied.com/elections/1980.html


Furthermore the literature suggests that the attitudes of non voters differ little from the attitudes of voters.... Non voters are very well represented by those who vote....

http://www.igs.berkeley.edu/publications/par/July1999/HightonWolfinger.html

Instead of engaging in the quioxitic exercise of chasing an electorate that doesn't exist maybe we should try to win a plurality or majority of the one that does...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Voter participation
Went up in 2000.

Who from the two big parties has ever chased, though?

Who has ever addressed non-voters or their reasons?

Besides saying: "non-voters, please vote for me"?

Who has ever addressed what motivates non-voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I Suggest You Read The Study....
There is very little difference in attitudes between voters and non voters....

An anedote to prove a larger point....

My business colleague and I were driving down AIA in Daytona Beach... I jokingkly told him we should go to the Boot Hill Saloon where hard core bikers go or folks that like to watch them go... Hells Angels and Outlaw types.... He demurred... I said I'd rather hang with those guys than a bunch of Republicans at a fern bar....

He said most of the bikers are prolly Republican if they vote... He's prolly right...

Read Hunter Thompson's work on the Hell's Angels to see how reactionary some working class folks are.... Heck, they even petitioned Nixon to send a contingent of Hells' Angels to Viet Nam

What makes you think non voters are more progressive than voters... As somebody who has worked as a bouncer and bartender to pay my way through college I have encountered working class attitudes that would make your hair stand on end...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Don't think it, didn't say it...
<i>What makes you think non voters are more progressive than voters.</i>

What makes you think I think that?

I think regardless of their views, the majority of non-voters are more apolitical than voters. Which is to say, no telling how they'd be if they were politicized, or if it's even possible to politicize them.

I do believe a significant minority of non-voters subscribe to the opinion that "they're all bums," and (my anecdotal evidence is as good as yours) their inchoate politics tend more to the progressive, anti-statist side (i.e., the candidate likeliest to pick these up would be a libertarian secularist with humor, preferably at a time of war or crisis. Sounds like Dean v. Bush to me.)

What makes you think there aren't votes to be won (selectively) within a group that makes up half the population?

Answer me this: why do Republicans prefer low turn out?

Also this: even if what you say is true, there must be ways to appeal to the progressive non-voters (as opposed to the ones you describe).

Also note this: Huge black registration and turnout drive in Florida in 2000. Lots of new voters. Worked well, Gore won (before having it stolen).

I know it's bad of me, but I probably won't get around to reading this study you mention. Sorry. I might, if you tell me how it deals with the following dilemma: Ever since I found out that an average of 70 percent of all respondents to all opinion polls HANG UP THE PHONE or otherwise do not complete the survey (and are thus not counted), I no longer trust any so-called representative studies. Studies get the people willing to talk - or else the people the studier wants to get. People who hang up (or refuse to participate) are obviously of a different personality than those who dutifully answer every question. If you pay people to be in a study, you're still only going to get the demographic who need the money.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I Agree With You And I Think The Author Would Agree With You
that turnout is crucial in c-l-o-s-e elections....


For instance in my state of Florida African Americans comprise 14% of the state's population yet they represented 16% of the electorate in 00....Think about that.... That's impressive...

Without this turnout Bush wouldn't have had to steal the election...

But don't forget when you mobilize your base your opponent is doing the same thing...


There are myriad problems with polling especially with the proliferation of fax machines. answering machines, caller id, cell phones, unresponsive people, et cetera but it's still the best tool we have for measuring folks opinions....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I just don't buy the "outsider" argument
for Dean. How long has he been a politician now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Especially Dean...
Remember Carter in 1976? Our govt is in chaos just like it was then. The outsider will win, and Dean is perceived as an outsider...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. But Dean is less likely to be that nice.
Carter is a nice guy and that is why he was so ineffective...got to kick patootie sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dean does. While making "voters" stay home.
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 04:45 PM by Kahuna
Kinda makes it a wash, doesn't it? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What do you mean by that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. cheap kick
w
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. It takes an attractive centrist candidate to get out..
the regular voting base. I don't see Dean getting out the centrist base. THAT's what I mean by that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm a Clark supporter but,
Even though Clark energized me a young professional black woman into the mix I think Dean has a better chance of pulling in white young professionals and college students. So I voted for Dean in this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Polls show that Clark leads with young voters..
Dean's young supporters are just louder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. That is very nice to hear...
I also think that Clark will lead with the ladies cuz he is sooooo
Dashing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dean
As said above, Dean has been attracting people in huge amounts that have never been involved w/political campaigns before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Actually I would say Kucinch first
Because he seems to attract a large number of a certain kind of previously "why bother?" kind of people. Unfortunately many of them will return to the "why bother" column when he drops out or loses the nomination.

Clark second because he is not a politician and people are sick of politicians. The Clark candidacy gives those people something to come out for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. What Clark does/What Dean does
I think Clark will bring in new voters, since he can communicate his anxieties about the nation's fate in an appealing package. Dean does some of this too, but I think Clark is better.

Where Dean is great--and is the first Democrat in a LONG time to do this--is bringing in NEW POLITICAL ACTIVISTS. Donors, canvassers, phone-callers, the like. In some ways, I think Dean brought me in, even though I went for Clark!

(Clark does this too, but so far Dean is doing this better, and Dean led the way for Clark and all the others.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
He loved Big Brother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dean, because I believe
he, more so than other candidates, energizes the youth vote. This demogrphic culd decide entire elections. Once candidates realize they can win much easier with a broad base of young supporters, I think they'd save themselves a lot of useless pandering to other demographics. We're passionate, and since each generation is more progressive than the last, you'd think this would be a basic piece of strategy automatically included in most Dem campaigns for any office. We are are looking for an ear that will listen to us and say the things we have been thinking since that fateful day in December of 2000. Dean got the show on the road early as well, which is in his favor.

Kucinich is also very good at rallying younger progressives, but his campaign is either poorly managed or he has been too busy upholding fundemental tenants of liberty and justice as Congressman to get his message out as well as Dean has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Dean or Clark.
Why? Because they already are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think Dean
from what I've seen at Meetups he gets a lot of people who either haven't voted in several years becuz they gave up on the system or new voters entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. Dean, with Clark running second
Dean is motivating people to become involved through grassroots initiatives; Clark is running because of a grassroots initiative.

Put these two men on a ticket together! Clark/Dean, Dean/Clark--- the order isn't the thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Dean's demographic
according to a good friend, who is a Republican consultant, is angry white males in their 30's. He's apparently not viewed as sympathetic by women and blacks. In fact, both groups consider him to be supercilious.
This comes out of focus groups, so I'm taking it with a grain of salt.
And, yes, I know and like a Republican. I only wish I could persuade him to work for the Democrats. But he keeps telling me the money is better on the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Let your friend
keep thinking that to his detriment.

Apparently, he has not seen the massive amounts of women that attend Dean's events, serve as hosts at his thousands of meet up, are on his staff and campaign for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. Kucinich
if he can get enough exposure. Once people who are alienated from the voting process because all candidates seem alike see that his platform actually means possible, positive change they will get out and vote for Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. kick
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. kick again...
want to see 300 votes here. Come on you non-voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fish Eye Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. and do not forget
many people do not vote because they see the polititians as rip off artists...kucinich is so far removed from that moniker that all a non voter would haev to do is see him speak ....they would turn out to vote for him!!!

Kucinich...is the real thing!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
birdman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. You mean all those mon-voters have pining away for...
a candidate who proposes a Department of Peace and
protection from space-based mind control weapons ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. snicker
he's reaaly harmless so I don't like to pile on but that was kinda funny. I do wish he, AS & CMB & JL would drop out & give the other candidates more meaninful exposure at the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
40. Dean. It's been happening across the nation.
That's obvious.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
42. The concensus at DU is pretty clear
80% (as of 11:13 a.m., CST) think it's Dean and Clark.

Dean/Clark in '04? Clark/Dean in '04? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC