Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Dean now has my respect as a general election candidate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:33 PM
Original message
Howard Dean now has my respect as a general election candidate
Winning the Presidency of the United States requires a certain amount of pandering. No President gets elected by gaining the support of his party. He ALWAYS has to innoculate himself from some criticism.

With the pro-gun, pro-death penalty, pro-confederate flag stance... Dean is now easilly electable.

In exchange for those issues, we will get an anti-war, pro-healthcare, pro-education, pro-government investment President....

I'll take that tradeoff anyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. where do you get that Dean is pro-Confederate flag?
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 09:37 PM by pruner
that's not what he said at all.

"I want people with confederate flags on their trucks to put down those flags and vote Democratic…"

http://www.blogforamerica.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It doesn't matter what he actually said....
He wasn't negative about the flag... that innoculates him from 'he's just a NE liberal' criticism.

I like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree to certain extent…
but there's a difference between not being negative about something & being positive about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. If I was a Dean operative in the south....
I would be printing out what he said, getting a list of every registered Independent... and putting it in their mailbox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
preocupied Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
57. How the fuck can you defend the symbol of the KKK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
49. Oh, Puhleez...
The guy used "confederate flag" in a sentence! Now you have every pollster and pundit in the country trying to make him controversial and unelectable.

Oh well, it sells papers, and the uninformed will buy it as news.

av8rdave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. if you are saying the "states rights" strategy is wise
in certain issues that affect swing voters, as long as he can do so without selling out, I agree

I've followed him closely from the beginning and am sold he's a decent man and when in office will do the right thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Basically that is what I am saying
Distance from the wedge issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. states rights appears to be his strategy
on these issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
55. There are a few state's rights issues that are doable
Things such as:

Unfunded Mandates
Civil Unions (which I think all marriages should be, the state should not sanction marriage at all)
Internet taxes

You can add to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. same place you get the 'DC anti-war protestors are 'communists,
castro-supporters, toxic, anti-American, red bandana Phillippos (spelling error intended), and screaming-foreign-speakers...'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Electability - 'tis the key.
I keep saying, Dean stands up to the values of our party, while still being able to appear less of an anti-gun freak than Gore did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Gore lost 2000* on guns
Without the gun issue, the Republican party had nothing in 2000.


*Gore actually won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. agree, but he rolled over and died on the environment
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 09:43 PM by Woodstock
listening to bum advice

my point is, we need to shout loud and long about our strong suits, but play it cool on our weak suits

*President Gore won
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Not really
Gore went out of his way to embrace the environmental issue, it just happened during the primaries. The Greens were making a big stink up in Minnesota (or was it Wisconsin?) because Nader supposedly had a 12 point pickup there.... of course, the Bush Cabal just used it to label Gore as a tree-hugging liberal, and we were defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. Bullcrap
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 11:16 PM by Stevie D
Watch this video, then come back and tell me again why Gore lost* the election, okay?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/progs/newsnight/palast.ram

*Gore won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Watch Deans numbers increase in the South.
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 09:43 PM by mzmolly
I'm afraid this little 'trick' just ensured a Dean vs. Bush match up. In addition, Dean just became electable in the South.

"Note: It is necessary to disclaim any connection of these flags to neo-nazis, red-necks, skin-heads and the like. These groups have adopted this flag and desecrated it by their acts. They have no right to use this flag - it is a flag of honor, designed by the confederacy as a banner representing state's rights and still revered by the South. In fact, under attack, it still flies over the South Carolina capitol building. The South denies any relation to these hate groups and denies them the right to use the flags of the confederacy for any purpose. The crimes committed by these groups under the stolen banner of the conderacy only exacerbate the lies which link the seccesion to slavery interests when, from a Southerner's view, the cause was state's rights."

Note contributed by BJ Meksikatsi.

http://www.usflag.org/confederate.stars.and.bars.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Won't happen. Expect the south to support Clark and Edwards...
and southern influence may result in that being the Dem ticket: Clark/Edwards.

Southerners only trust southerners. Dean can pander all he wants, but the south will support a southerner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Possibly, but I'm not talking about them
If Clark or Edwards gets the nomination, I would expect them to garner some southern support. I do not dismiss either of them. In this thread, I was trying to express my new belief that Dean would be able to get some southern support also.

It depends on who wins the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Southerners aren't that easily swayed.
He can talk the talk, but he isn't a "from-here" southern boy, so I don't expect there to be any broad support for him in the South.

It is well documented the determinative factor that the south has on presidential candidate nominations. I expect Clark or Edwards to be our next Democratic candidate for prez, and the other to be the VP half of the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
38. I expect your wrong. Dean is ahead in NH and polling well in Iowa.
It's all over but the crying now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #38
61. When did NH and Iowa become southern states???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. It's not about pandering, it's about flaming over a pretty dull statement
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 11:14 PM by mzmolly
and bringing the issue into the main stream media. That comment would not have made it's way into Southern homes were it not for the 'fall out'...

So again I say thank you Dean foes. You just ensured another spike in the polls for Dean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Dean thinks the confederate flag crowd will jump...
to his campaign? More like they'll vote for Bush and Black Democrats won't vote, good strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Dean's point is that there's no reason for the "confederate flag crowd" to
vote Republican.

after all, :wtf: have the republicans ever done for them? not a damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Duh...that's no new revelation...
But Southern Republicans don't vote in consideration of their pocketbook; they vote on social issues. And the Rebel-flag wavers are a group that Dean has NO HOPE of influencing, mainly because this core group of southerners still distrust "outsiders."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. "Duh"! It may not be a "new" thing but Dean
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 11:07 PM by zidzi
is bringing it to the forefront and talking about it loud and clear.

And Dean has Plenty of "Hope"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #30
62. In the south, he doesn't. Not when there are two...
Edited on Sun Nov-02-03 12:57 AM by jchild
southerners on the dem ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Thank you pruner...that's the REAL point...it has nothing to do
w/ being "pro confederate flag" etc. He want to ask the very provocvative question of these FORMER Democrats, "why do you vote Repug?" It's very simple you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Right. Confederate toting southerners will vote Republican unless
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 10:03 PM by jchild
a son of the South is nominated. They won't indulge in regional betrayal to support a "yankee Democrat." Just won't happen, and Dean is making himself look foolish by even dreaming that he can carry those Rebel-flag-waving Southerners. Clark may, Edwards may--they're both southerners--but no way will Dean.

Edit: their to they're---doh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Well, he IS correct about one thing in what he said.
Even those reactionary schmucks need health insurance and good schools for their kids and other stuff that's being priced beyond their reach under the current bastards in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. And those "reactionary schmucks" still fear big government and espouse
the tenets of rugged individualism. It is quite a paradox, is it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Well considering the statement was made on several occasions
and Dean has much support in the African American community, I'd say your wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Wrong, Dean has the support of two black leaders...
not the entire African American community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Your statement is incorrect and insulting???
Do you now speak for the Black Community?

http://www.blacksfordean.com/endorsements.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Quit being disingenuous.
No I don't speak for the African American Community. I'm sure Dean has the support of many African Americans, but you implied that the whole community was behind Dean. I just called you on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. You're the one being "disingenuous"...mzmolly said no such thing.
Actually, the quote was "Dean has much support in the African American community". YOU tried to imply that she said that the whole community was behind Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Yep, I read it wrong.
Edited on Sun Nov-02-03 12:16 AM by SahaleArm
Although I did say implied; It's like I crossed my fingers:).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. That's ridiculous...give blacks some credit for crying out loud!
Do you honestly think black voters will be mad if a white candidate tries to point out that white and black people actually care about the same kinds of things and have the same basic needs? Someone has needed to say these things in the south for a long damn time. Why is everyone so afraid to talk about this stuff? That's part of the problem! When you point out the common ground different groups share it opens the door to progress. Anyone who get's their undies in a bunch over this is being foolish. Blacks in America have been wanting to talk about these things for decades, and it's only going to turn off the people who don't respect black people enough to view them as rational, thinking individuals who are not any different than white people when all is said and done. We all have the same basic needs, desires and concerns. The race baiting being encouraged by the other campaigns is what I find absolutely disgusting. People on here have got to stop thinking that black voters care any less about getting rid of Bush than white people do. It's dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. You need to read up...
on what the confederate flag represents. Hint, it's not southern pride nor unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. You need to read post # 10, which gives an explanation of what that
flag represents to many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. I've read it and I don't buy the argument
I also don't believe in revisionism nor do I care to stand behind what the confederate flag represents today. If these words ring a bell, let me know: Jim Crow, Separate but Equal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. So you know the hearts of every American who waves the CF...
Edited on Sat Nov-01-03 11:45 PM by mzmolly
Naw... See post # 32 from a Southern DU'er. The flag means different things to differnt people. And, if you don't believe in revisionism, you should read Dean's quote in context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Confederate States of America?
I choose not to associate myself with the confederate flag. Everyone has the right to free association.

Post #32: I live in Tampa and totally agree.

What does this anecdote tell me?


> you should read Dean's quote in context

I was responding to you're contention (post #10) that it would improve Dean's southern electability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #40
63. Karaokekarlton
I applaud your insight. We are truly at a point in this country where together we stand and divided we have fallen oh so far. Blacks have truly been asking for decades for honest discussions on race and getting it out in the open. I really think there is no better time than now. We say it is time to turn the corner then let's turn it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. I live in Tampa and totally agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. Um.....no
The stupid thing about Dean's pandering is that of all the candidates with a legitimate shot at the nomination (Clark, Edwards, Gephardt, Kerry), he probably has the least chance of getting even a minor share of the culturally conservative working class to vote for him. If he got anywhere near close in the Southern states, which he won't, the Bush campaign and the "independent" right-wing interest groups that support Bush would unload a bazillion dollars worth of advertising saying "civil unions...only state with a Socialist congressman...'I suppose it was a good thing that Saddam was removed'...civil unions." People have said that they want to leave the country if Bush is elected; I'd want to leave the country during a Bush-Dean race because it would be like reliving 1988 all over again. I'd hope for the best and fear the worst.

I'm sorry but there's a huge cultural chasm between the South and a New England Governor who grew up on Park Avenue and has a youth-movement/Internet-based lefty following, and it wouldn't be overcome if he nailed Dolly Parton live onstage at the Grand Ole Opry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. You're right...and...LMFAO!!
The Dolly comment made me laugh out loud! It is SOOOO TRUE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. You left out this gem:
"The U.S. will not always be the strongest nation in the world militarily".

Put away all those other dumb things he said because that takes the cake- lock, stock, and barrel- hands down it is THE one. It's the deal breaker with Dean. It's the stupidest thing he ever said.
It's like: Head for the hills stupid.
Radioactive.
Get away from me.
You're done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. It's a very good point
but I realize many Americans are not use to a steady diet of truth.

America is the most powerful nation in the world but it is not more powerful than the rest of the world. Jr and the PNAC crowd seem to be doin' a pretty good job at getting the rest of the world to realize how smart they'd be to form alliances.

As it is our most feared enemy doesn't even have a state of its own much less a military.

Your hatred for Dean is alarming. Do you know hate is like poison? Really bad for you.

Julie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Thank You. and it will NEVER sell in the general election
It is so thoroughly naive it actually makes Bush look competent in national security. Americans will summarily reject Dean for that ONE idiotic statement.
And I don't hate Dean. I am just very afraid that Democrats will nominate him. Because there is no way in hell he can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. I think you have issues
Americans will summarily reject Dean for that ONE idiotic statement.

Shooting for some absurdity title here or what?


And I don't hate Dean.


I shudder to think how you'd behave if you did then.

I am just very afraid that Democrats will nominate him. Because there is no way in hell he can win.

That will be an especially helpful attitude if he takes the nomination. Do you lay awake nights to come up with these productive statements to help kick the fascists out? You know, if Dean wins the nom you could probably get hired at Faux or Moonie Times, you could submit your DU posts as samples of your non-hateful views of him.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. It's an indefensible statement
America's military superiority is an a priori fact. It is unacceptable to any American who cares about a secure future for themselves and their children.
That you are even defending it scares me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #48
58. Why do people with legitimate Dean criticisms
have to suffer through BS psychoanalysis at the hands of Dean supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #58
64. Oh the hypocrisy...
Dean supporters who condemned Lott for his adoration of Thurmond would welcome Thurmond's supporters into their fold. Indeed, the same DUers who celebrated Thurmond's death now celebrate the inclusiveness of the Dean sect!

That, my friend, is astonishing, is it not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. well, yes, because lots of DU interlopers just want to split the
party and push forward the best 'loser' against bush*...it's so transparent...wouldn't be surprised if (besides the interlopers) kkkarl rove isn't putting some funds behind the least able to beat the shrub...it's an old party trick....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yes. Nader served them well and they funded him well
in the "splitting up the party" game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. Respect Seems An Odd Word For Pandering
<>

<>

<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Yes, I think pandering was a bit harsh...
Perhaps I'm looking for another word..... or phrase.... 'reaching out.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ambassador Hope Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. Dean is not pro rebel flag
I do not hear him saying that. Anyone running for office should hope everyone should vote for them. It would be different if he said he was back the rebels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_Shadows_1 Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-03 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. New Respect for Howard Dean...
... look at this earlier quote:

" At that event, Dean received a rousing ovation from the crowd when he said, "White folks in the South who drive pickup trucks with Confederate flag decals on the back ought to be voting with us, and not , because their kids don't have health insurance either, and their kids need better schools too."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #46
56. He could have stopped at pickup trucks.
But he continued to include the confederate flag. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #56
59. because he stopped himself before he got to "and gun racks" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. It's impressive...
to see Dean supporters justify the confederate flag using RNC code words. Southern pride, Southern Unity, Celebrating Ancestory, or the oft used 'Other Reasons'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-03 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
65. hey, you said something i agree with!
Edited on Sun Nov-02-03 01:44 AM by dfong63
With the pro-gun, pro-death penalty, pro-confederate flag stance... Dean is now easilly electable.

In exchange for those issues, we will get an anti-war, pro-healthcare, pro-education, pro-government investment President....


in any sort of winner-takes-all system, compromise is unavoidable. no one man can be all things to all people. Dean represents a compromise i can live with.

on edit: but i don't believe Dean sad he was pro-confederate-flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC