This is from a thread posted in the Foreign Affairs/National Security 9/11, Military Affairs, and Terrorism forum. I haven't seen it posted in GD and thought it important to bring up here. The link is:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=125&topic_id=3672Basically, the article in the Christian Science Monitor is about a case so secret theat there is no record of it -- the entire docket is sealed. The author said the case may force examination of the secret tactics employed by Ashcroft.
I think it's pretty creepy. If the Supremes take up this case, and work in utter secrecy, what's to prevent them from secretly overturning the Bill or Rights or cancelling the next presidential election? I would think that Breyer, Ginsburg, Stevens, and Souter would prevent this from happening, but the others???? What do you think?
article snip:
The justices consider a petition for a case with no public record.
By Warren Richey
MIAMI – It's the case that doesn't exist. Even though two different federal courts have conducted hearings and issued rulings, there has been no public record of any action. No documents are available. No files. No lawyer is allowed to speak about it. Period.
Yet this seemingly phantom case does exist - and is now headed to the US Supreme Court in what could produce a significant test of a question as old as the Star Chamber, abolished in 17th-century England: How far should a policy of total secrecy extend into a system of justice?
article link:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1030/p01s02-usju.html