BloodyWilliam
(665 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 04:39 PM
Original message |
Do we really need to "finish the job?" |
|
Our men are dying literally every day and I honestly do NOT see any conceivable way for us to influence without violent coercion (or even "cleansing" of troubled regions) the development in government in Iraq. How much more could it hurt if all of our men hauled ass back to the states before another dozen troops get gunned down?
|
kalian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 04:43 PM
Response to Original message |
1. And what "job" is that...? |
|
:shrug: Get the oil flowing again? Make the world "safe for democracy"...?
|
flamingyouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Keep the commies out of Saigon? |
|
Oh, wait, sorry - wrong war...
|
wuushew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 04:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I hope you are not advocating pullout without some backup plan? |
BloodyWilliam
(665 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
How is it going to make the situation any worse than the bloodstained quagmire we're in now? At least then our troops will be safer, and the Middle Eastern fanatics will no longer be able to play the occupation card to get followers.
|
Karenina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. There was no viable "plan" to begin with |
|
Stay and "finish" the job? What job? Decimating the Iraqi people? Getting untold THOUSANDS killed and maimed? Reducing the "excess" population??? :mad:
Get a clue here. Please allow me to proffer an analogy. If someone breaks down the door to YOUR house, pisses on YOUR carpet, terrorizes YOUR family, tying your children up in plastic handcuffs and ASSAULTING YOUR WIFE, breaks all of the heirlooms Grandma left you, HUMILIATES you, destroys YOUR home, brings in animals YOU consider unclean and allows them to piss on YOUR furniture, then leaves finding NOTHING incriminating against you with not so much as a "very sorry" would YOU want THAT PERSON to be "in charge" of "cleaning up the mess?" :wtf:
|
Pastiche423
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. What will "we" accomplish |
|
by staying there?
There was no exit plan going in and there is not one now. All that is being accomplished, IMHO, is more deaths on both sides.
|
Kamika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Moral and all that.
Im raised too good
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I do believe that we shouldn't cut and run because that could create another Afghanistan.
On the other hand I've always thought this was unwinnable which is why I never agreed with this war in the 1st place.
Looks like a no win situation to me.
|
Kanary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. "Our men are dying literally every day" |
|
You may have noticed that today one of the dead was a *woman*, who joins several of her military sisters who have died in this mess.
Kanary
|
BloodyWilliam
(665 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. In this patriarchal society, |
|
The male indefinite is acceptable to use to refer to members of both genders.
And it sounds more dramatic.
|
Kanary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. It will continue to be patriarchal |
|
if you continue to make it so.
And, no, it's *not* acceptable.
Kanary
|
wuushew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. "soldier" is a gender neutral term |
|
Edited on Sun Nov-02-03 05:39 PM by wuushew
or one could say our men AND women killed in combat.
|
Kanary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. " one could say our men AND women killed in combat." |
|
Most of the press has been using this form, yes.
Most of the press has been careful to include women in reports of the military.
Kanary
|
BloodyWilliam
(665 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Can we keep this thread on track? We can argue about semantics and patriarchal bias another time.
Our soldiers/troops are dying. That better?
|
Kanary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. Our soldiers/troops are dying. That better? |
|
Thank you.
It's no small thing.
Have you seen the thread on "stealth" of women's issues?
If our issues don't matter, then ... Oh, I can't believe we're still debating the same things we were during the Vietnam era.
sigh..
Kanary
|
Don_G
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Was to bleed America dry of money and of manpower that can possibly think independantly.
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
16. As soon as someone can coherantly explain the Objective |
|
One cannot execute an exit plan without Clear objectives . Was the objective to "oust Saddam" ? if it was, that objective is complete
Was the objective to Secure Oil Fields ? that is not complete
Was the objective to find weapons of mass destruction ? :eyes:
Was the objective to Build a Democracy in Iraq ? :eyes:
Was the objective to invade occupy and rule ? :scared:
|
Karenina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. The "OBJECTIVE" remains |
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
19. No! Get OUT immediately. |
|
There will be a bloody reckoning in Iraq no matter what we do and nothing except Halliburton's bank account benefits by our participation.
|
elperromagico
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 06:29 PM
Response to Original message |
20. This administration doesn't "finish" jobs |
|
This administration has the attention span of a gnat; sooner or later, they'll get bored with Iraq and move on to their next project (Iran maybe? or perhaps Syria? or could it be France?).
|
Wapsie B
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-02-03 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Getting the Nazis out of DC? |
|
Sure. Staying in Iraq? Nope.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |