if bush loses

[Stupdworld]

does that mean the pnac/nwo/bbv/trilateral commission/illuminati conspiracy never existed? or did it mean they have too many catberts running their organizational structure? I mean how can a global multinational corporation inspired network with aims for global power possibly lose an election in which they rigged everything?

i mean, its like bush has to win in order for all this inconceivable, epic, zerg-like evil to be validated!


in other words, if bush loses, they just dont make super villains like they used to.

i miss lex luthor.

[NewYorkerfromMass]

1. If we nominate Dean he won't

I am afraid.

[Stuckinthebush]

3. But if we do...

You will vote for him....right?

I'd hate to think that any Dem or progressive would make an indirect vote for Bush by not voting for the eventual nominee.

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[NewYorkerfromMass]

11. Are you a good representative of Dean supporters?

or a parody of one?

[hang a left]

2. Maybe it means that their cover is blown and they need

a new face.

[Mistress Quickly]

4. ok, put on your tinfoil...

If Bush loses, maybe whoever wins is part of PNAC!
Maybe its all part of the plan.

:tinfoilhat: :silly:

[Screaming Lord Byron]

5. No conspiracy is 100% foolproof. Otherwise we wouldn't be here, right?

[On the Road]

6. There is Always an Elite and a Tacit Coalition of Interests

just like racial attitudes used to be in the South uner segregation. It does not center on one person and it is not all-powerful. If it were the world would not have been the strides it has towards inclusiveness, suffrage, and fairness.

Just like during civil rights days, it takes an active, aware, and passionate populace to drive the agenda. It can work.

[calimary]

7. I will be celebrating for weeks!

[HFishbine]

8. Absence of evidence

is not evidence of absence.

[tom_paine]

9. More sneering insults from stupdworld

You know, I imagine you in 1933 Germany, "But how could the Fuhrer have set the Reichstag Fire himself?"

How about in 1973, "It is quite patently absurd to believe that a President of the United Sattes would abuse his office in such a way. Do you really think there is a group of CIA rogue agents going around spying on Democrats and perpetrating dirty tricks?"

I could go on and with items which, once investigated and sanitized, become "safe" for someone like you to discuss and believe in. Of course, these things (and many others like them) all strated out as wacky "conspiracy theories" that people like you sneered at arrogantly.

Yet where would we be if people didn't have the courage to investigate these "wacky conspiracy theories"?

What is quite tiresome is your sneering marginalizations, designed to remove any legitimate questioning on the topics of Cosnpriacy to Commit Fraud (and perhaps worse).

PNAC is certainly real, and it's goals are spelled out as clearly as those in Mein Kampf.

Have you actually READ PNAC's manifesto? Perhaps you should prior to sneering, although I realize that isn't quite as much fun.

[Stupdworld]

13. 100%

you're right. making fun of stuff is fun.

[tom_paine]

15. But foolish in time of distress...

You still haven't answered my questions, not that I'd expect that.

Did you dismiss Watergate as a wacky conspiracy theory in '72?

Or were you too young or not yet born? (gosh, what a surprise THAT would be!)

Mightn't you be happier on a video game discussion site? There's lots of dumb stuff to make fun of there!

[htuttle]

12. You see, the problem is that the Bush administration is incompetent

They aren't merely imperialists. They are incompetent imperialists.

That should be clear by now. Watch anything but Faux News lately, and you'd see that.

Speaking of Lex Luthor, where's Osama bin Laden? Where's Saddam?

[grannylib]

14. Osama who? And Saddam is "gone" like the Taliban...Shrub said so....