Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate to approve 87.5B without roll call vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:22 PM
Original message
Senate to approve 87.5B without roll call vote
In other words the ayes will "have it" without any particular senator having to own up to his/her vote. This is total bullshit. These bunch of pansyshits should be responsible for thier votes. AMERICA DESERVES BETTER. Truly shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. We've come a long way baby
Gutless wonders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes,
gutlless wonders says it very well. The Democrats in congress have surely failed us Democrats.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. The United States Senate
As Bette Davis would say, "What a dump!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. They should all be, y'know....
Ashamed of themselves.

Whores and traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry and Edwards opposed it.
along with 9 other Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You mean...
...Kerry and Edwards are serious about wanting the Democratic nomination in 2004? Way to friggin' go, guys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. AMERICA might deserve better, but Amerika (the Empire)
deserves nothing but to lick the boots of their Bushevik Masters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Scary we may as well give up.
Please let none from Congress run on the Dem ticket. Crooks and weak willed SOB's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. The only "good" thing about this secret vote
Is that these pricks don't want their names attached to the Quagmire anymore.

Heh heh heh.

Coming back to bite these moronic chickenshits in the ass. Not a moment too soon.

They should all be tossed out on their fat butts for authorizing Smirk to invade Iraq (except the valiant few who fought it and VOTED AGAINST IT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. yeah, okay ... i see your point. .. good point ....
I'll hold on to that thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. This really does smack of the Roman Senate
and the way it rubber-stamped the Emperor's wishes. I am afraid we have "crossed the Rubicon", here, kids. If you had any doubts that we are now a full-fledged empire, here is the image to convince you. Hail Ceasar! What a thing to live to see...the end of the Republic. It slaps us in the face every day and tomorrow it will grind us under foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Disgusting! They throw away $87B of our money that we need right here.....
at home in our own country and they cannot even bother to call the roll. .... a real slap in the face of our people and nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. and folks wonder...
... why many of us DISQUALIFY anyone currently sitting in the senate as a presidential candidate. Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. and i'm writing to each and everyone of them to let them know just what
slimebags they are and that we have their number!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. even the ones who will vote against it?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. If any of them were against it...
...Why wouldn't they demand a roll call vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. It can only mean
Edited on Mon Nov-03-03 04:48 PM by jokerman2004
there will be hell to pay for all this.

Hell to pay, everyone knows it, and no one is willing to foot the bill when it comes due.

We should be afraid I think.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Link?
I want to know their rationale for this one. Who proposed it? What spineless weiners. Hell, they give spineless weiners a good name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Doesn't it only take a single Senator to call for a roll call?
I don't know how it works in the Senate, but the way Robert's Rules has been implemented everywhere I've actually used it is that all it takes is a single person eligible to vote to say, "Roll Call!", and you get a roll call vote.

It seems that even the ones who might be against it are being complicit in covering for the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-03 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. Once again, the Supreme Court sets a shining example!
Does this remind anyone else of how they wouldn't sign off on the bu$h v. Gore opinion?

:grr:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC