Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge's "The Reagans" gloat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
J B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:11 PM
Original message
Drudge's "The Reagans" gloat
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash9rr.htm

Just read it. My only comment is... this man is launching a full-scale celebration about the right wing's application of the "free speech" movement, where the mob has the right to shout down the speech of anyone they don't like because the mob is free to do so, to the public airwaves, because "we, the public" owns them in principle. This is gloating over the achieving of censorship by mob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. He has every right to gloat, he won.
They win everything these days, I'm starting to thing there is no place for the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
info being Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. On CBS, no there isn't
When has it been different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livinontheedge Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think this will backfire on the republicans.
Doubtless, most thinking people will view this as pure censorship, and will see the republican effort to torpedo this movie as extremist activism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I wish it would
but it won't. People will just think that it must have been pretty bad for them to have pulled it.

Pulling it is lose-lose for CBS. They have all the negitive press and they look like idiots. They have won absolutely no converts with this move but lost supporters. It is a total disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ronnie was thrilled when Nancy gave him the news.
Edited on Tue Nov-04-03 01:17 PM by 2dumb2beprez
His exact words were, "The purple albatross just shit on my cowboy boots."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. AAAAAAUGH! VOGON POETRY!!!!
commencing gnawing off my own left arm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. They think they have won!
Actually, they have lost, just like the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JewelDigger Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Was wondering what this sentence is supposed to mean...
A free broadcast network, available to all over the public airwaves, has different standards than media the public must pay to view.

This is on drudge's mainpage....from the CBS 'official statement'.

What does this mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Someone at CBS was channeling Orwell
that "automatic writing" crap.

Orwell wouldn't understand a PC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JewelDigger Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. hmmmm....
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ah, well
the right has finally learned how to do a boycott, at least this once. We'll have to adjust our tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunBobbyMucha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. ...and make the eventual Showtime airing a huge ratings event.
The fact that this is the same cable network that gave us Action Figure George in that 9/11 P.O.S. makes this a bitter pill to swallow, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Why?
...and make the eventual Showtime airing a huge ratings event.

You really want a film about RR to be a huge ratings event? They might start making more films about him if that works. Frankly, I'm glad he's quiet, although I do feel some normal sympathy for anyone who has Alzheimers. Not a lot, though. Please, let's just let the man fade away in peace... can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's look at Tom Shales writing about Bush*
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A33336-2003Sep5¬Found=true

This is Shales reviewing a proppogandizing fils about Sept. 11th that demonstrably alters events...but the freepers were silent about these alterations of the historical record. It kinda makes their hysteria about Reagan a little more transparent.

"The film is an insult to those who perished in the attacks and, really, an insult to America generally, but it's so insanely boring that people aren't likely to become very outraged over it. Written by conservative Republican Lionel Chetwynd, who admits to a bias in Bush's favor, the film -- premiering on Showtime tomorrow night at 8 -- is primitive propaganda that portrays Bush as the noblest hero since Mighty Mouse.

Nothing in historical record suggests Bush acted particularly heroically Sept. 11, 2001, but Chetwynd's script has him all but saddling up a horse and riding over to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban man-to-man. When Bush announces he will give a speech to the nation from the White House and aides try to talk him into seeking a safer location, Bush bellows, "If some tinhorn terrorist wants me, tell him to come on over and get me. I'll be home!"

Bush repeatedly demands he be taken to the White House as Air Force One flies aimlessly about on that horrible September day: "I've got to get back to Washington because I'm not going to let those people keep me from getting home," he barks. And earlier: "Get me home! . . . The American people want to know where their damn president is." And still earlier: "People can't have an AWOL president!"

All this may be pure fantasy that occurred only in Chetwynd's head, or wishful thinking by members of the Bush administration, who cooperated with Chetwynd in his research. Actual footage of the World Trade Center towers burning and collapsing is used as part of this love letter to the president, an especially unseemly touch. "

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Chickenshit Broadcasting System
As they will forever more be named. Not to be confused with Peacock Network
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. I hope they release it to video
I would love to buy a copy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Drudge is aggressively trying to fill Limbaugh's big fat vacuum
Edited on Tue Nov-04-03 02:17 PM by Snellius
Drudge, the great libertarian defender of freedom of expression, now advocating the political intimidation of the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. too bad
wouldn't have watched it anyway. Don't subscribe 2 Showtime - don't think many do - their series pale next to 'Six Feet Under', 'Sopranos', & 'Sex'n the City'. I did C the Chris Issak show once - not bad but very shabby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC