Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Geez...Spinsanity attacks both sides of the ideological spectrum

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:55 AM
Original message
Geez...Spinsanity attacks both sides of the ideological spectrum
They go after David Corn and Bernard Goldberg. Go figure.
____________________________________________________________________

In recent weeks, a debate has raged over the phrase "imminent threat." Many liberal critics have asserted that a central claim in President Bush's case for war in Iraq was that Iraq posed an "imminent threat." They argue that it's now clear that no such threat existed, and thus the President's argument has been revealed as deceptive or illegitimate. Conservatives retort that Bush never actually used the phrase and in fact specifically used language indicating that the threat was not imminent on several occasions.

As a factual matter, conservatives are largely correct and liberal critics and journalists are guilty of cheap shots or lazy reporting. However, the evidence is not completely clear and both sides are guilty of distorting this complex situation for political gain. Specifically, while there's some evidence indicating the Bush administration did portray Iraq as an imminent threat, there's much more that it did not. Those attempting to assert that the White House called Iraq an imminent threat are ignoring significant information to the contrary. Similarly, those who say the Bush administration never used the phrase or implied as much are ignoring important, though isolated, evidence.

http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20031103.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the threat wasn't imminent, then why was there such an urgency to
attack immediately? Typical bullshit coming from the WH, their actions and their words don't match up. If the threat wasn't immenent why not let the inspectors do their jobs? Do they think we have forgotten all of that already? I am so f*ing sick of this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dwckabal Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. They may do both sides
but it sure does seem they pick apart the left much much more than they do the right. For example, they absolutely shred Michael Moore, yet Ann Coulter only gets superficial treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC