Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wanna help me interview Sidney Blumenthal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:12 PM
Original message
Wanna help me interview Sidney Blumenthal?
I wrote a quasi-review of his book 'The Clinton Wars' (read that book, btw), and Mr. Blumenthal was kind enough to write me a very nice note of thanks. Of course, I approached him immediately for a truthout interview, and he readily agreed (because he rules).

He was interested in aiming the interview towards questions about how the Clinton impeachment has affected the politics of today. That leaves a wide lane to run through. Wanna help? Put any questions below. And wiched major thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ask him about the Guardian U.S.
He was supposed to be involved in a U.S. edition of the Guardian, find out what's up with that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. Yes, I also had read he would be the editor of the U.S. edition
Very interested to know if and when

And don't forget to mention he is an American hero in his own right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. "executive priviledge" - if it didn't work for Clinton, why does it work
for Trickier Dick re: energy papers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. The vastly polarized results of the 00 election
and the subsequent fractures in the body politic, don't seem to be healing. Is there a chance this will ever happen, or are we condemned to relive the ("perceived") theft of an election every four years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does he think it was it a mistake for Senate Dems to roll over
and not join the black caucus in protesting the selection of Bush? Would it have made a difference if just one Senate Dem had made life that much harder for Bush in the beginning?

Does he think it's significant that only 54% of Americans believe Bush was legitimately elected (according to Harper's)? Can or should Dems make Bush's illegitimacy an issue in 2004? How could they do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not terribly on topic, but...
I'd love to know if he has more details on what the Pentagon did to Clark. He seems to be one of the few with inside information who's been willing to talk about it, so I'd like to know if he can tell even more than he did in his excellent book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. (quid pro quo) YES. Excellent question.
I definitely would like to hear his perspective on this, given that he was really enthusiastic about Clark in his book. Also, I'd like to hear him talk about whether he thinks the media hates Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. ask him if the least of chimpy's lies
are more reason for impeachment than clinton's sex lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. ok, I'll try
What accounts for George W. Bush's stubbornly high approval ratings with Republican voters despite the economy and war? His father faced a primary challenge. Does it go back to the politicalization of impeachment and the highly partisan 2000 election? Did impeachment lead to the extreme polarization on the left and right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. I know I'm risking a huge amount of derision...however,
I'd love to hear him say a little more about the predicament he thinks Blair is in, and whether he approves of the direction Blair is headed, if he sees it as holding the line until the Democrats win again, and, in a big picture sense, whether it's liberalism and progessivism that Blair is persuing.

I read The Clinton Wars as being an extremely sympathetic portrayal of Blair. However, he's says nothing about Blair post-2000, I think.

I'd love to hear what he has to say about Blair since 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. EXCELLENT question...
I'd love to hear his take on that as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Heh, you could ask him about Labour in the 60s
and why he thinks that the abolishment of capital punishment in 1965 lost them the next-but-one election, when it was a non-party vote, and everyone else thinks it was the economy that decided the 1970 election.

Sorry, AP, I couldn't resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You don't have to ask him,
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 07:58 PM by AP
it's in his book.

He says tories used it to portray labour as soft on crime.

It's funny that you respond to me here, but not in that other thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Unlikely to be in a library here in the UK
and a good chance it won't be available to browse in bookshops either. And I'm not buying it just to check his accuracy on one thing. Anyway, the point is to ask him why he said it, when it doesn't agree with other commentators.

Cheap shots like my post above are, well, cheap; I have to muster more enthusiasm for wading through the morass of your argument in the other thread before responding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. It took a long time, but that one earned the zzzzzzzs
Now I know there's nothing more to be gained from engaging with you.

You can have the run of the boards now without me jumping in, and you are free to post anything you want after my posts without having to worry about a rebuttal from me.

Have at it.

It's all yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. make sure you post a link when you get the interview done
can't wait to see it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. It'll be after the 12th
He's on the road until then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Also, I suspect that he'd never talk aboput the crop of candidates in
a way which would be perceived as an endorsement. Yet, I'm desperate to know what he REALLY thinks of the campaign.

I read an interview with Clinton in which he talked about "meta-messages". Perhaps you could have Sid talk about what he thinks each candidate's meta-message is. You know, like he's deciphering the clues, reading the smoke signals. Perhaps this would help give some insight into what he thinks about the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ask him what they hell informed citizens need to read/watch?
I'd ask him what he thought about the media coverage of the Schwarzenegger campaign. Does he think, as I do, that the media tipped the scales in Arnold's favor?

What can we read/watch if we can't stomach CNN etc. And what do you need to read/watch to stay informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. My Questions
Why haven't Democrats developed the same political infrastructure the right wing has?

Why hasn't the left developed a network like Fox News?

Why doesn't the left have the same drive of the right?

What can we all do to make the media treat us and our candidates fairly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. Does he agree with Paul Krugman that something alarming is going on?
That we're in the midst of a revolution or a coup d'etat, American-style? Does the sight of Ted Olson as Solicitor General and all those children of Supreme Court justices in the admin make him nervous, angry, outraged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Give him a series of words/ideas that might/should be important
in the campaign, and get his reaction, like free association.

"Iraq"

"race"

"Progressive taxation"

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'd be Interested in His Take on
why it seemed so easy for Republicans to pull legal and administrative maneuvers (changing legal precedent for the Paula Jones lawsuit, independent counsel, etc), but the Democrats have had very little success since Jan 01.

It almost seems that the effect of the impeachment was to make political persecution easier for Republicans and more difficult for Democrats.

And, if the impeachment turned off many Americans to the partisan crusades, how does he suggest the Democrats pursue legitimate issues (like the Sep 11 commission and the energy meetings) on which Republicans are stonewalling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I think the reason is because the Republicans control the House and Senate
and it's really hard to get something going if don't chair a committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. ask him if he thinks
the perceived "victory' of the "moral right" (in getting the Clinton impeachment through) led to an upsurge in voters for the Republican party. Or if he thinks that a significant percentage of average/swing voters were convinced (by the impeachment procedings) of Clintons guilt, and thus connected that perceived lapse to the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. ask him
how you can get a hold of Joe Wilson to interview...;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'd like to know if he learned anything truly frightening
about how American politics is operated while being at the center of power. He was in a position to connect some of the dots that the most paranoid among us are collecting about the BFEE and the vast right wing conspiracy. Did he see anything or hear anything that would really make the hairs on our necks stand up on end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
26. How can DEMs win when it's VRWC 24/7?
Let's see. The GOPers control the House and Senate. The courts are manned by hand-picked turds of the Heritage Foundation, oops, I mean Federalist Society. And they stole the White House.

And the media? They ignore acts of treason right and righter. Thus, we DEMs are operating in a different world than existed for the Clinton impeachment.

Please ask Mr. Blumenthal what the minority party can do to leverage its position into one of strength on the campaign trail. It seems voting the unelected fraud out is the only thing we can do for a successful Chimpeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
30. Conspiracy of Hope?
We need a message of hope.

Ever since the impeachment witch hunt, I have felt such despair. It is as if I must brace myself for the next blow. No one should live like there is a never ending sense of impending doom.

In 1992, I was 20 years old. Prior to Mr. Clinton's arrival onto the national stage, my friends and I did not know if we could afford to go to college or find a job that would sustain us. The future looked quite bleak for many. Our dreams were smashed before they could ever grow. Bill Clinton inspired such hope and excitement amongst my friends. We believed that the future could be ours under his leadership. I believed in my own future.

Now, I fear, we have burned the bridge to the 21 century. Where is the hope? Will the Democratic Party become the party of hope again? In an age of fear and worry, we need something to look towards. Is there a national goal on the horizon? Or is the future more fear, war and hate?

Since the Impeachment witch hunt, the Democratic Party has become the party of reaction. I would ask Mr. Blumenthal, is there anyone in the leadership who is willing to take charge, and inspire the next generation? I little praise goes a long way. We Americans are frightened and sad. We need (to borrow Amnesty International’s words) a conspiracy of hope.

I’m rambling here, and I don’t even know if I am making any sense, but there is my 2 cents. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC