Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark: The military should provide abortion services

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:06 PM
Original message
Clark: The military should provide abortion services
At the Planned Parenthood debate webcasted just now, he said he would change things so that service personnel could have abortions in military hospitals.

He was asked if he supported the current system where female service personel couldn't get abortions in military hospitals. He immediately spoke an unequivocable "no" and that he would change it. Then he joked that he now had 53 seconds left to talk, lol.

This takes guts, I think -- abortions in military hospitals. Yikes. Talk about political hot potatoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ha ha ha - he will probably be denounced for this by the rightwing, for
being a commie who's "out of touch with mainstream American values."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone want to still claim he's a Republican?
Pretty gutsy. He deserves a lot of credit for taking a no-holds-barred approach to the abortion issue. He certainly isn't afraid of the political ramifications.

If Clark wins the nomination, the debates could be seriously entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. WHAT DEBATES????????
There is no way bushco will agree to debate any dem ... but especially Clark.

Remember, they first agreed to 4 in 2000 and then put so many qualifications that none of the debates was a debate in the old style ... pre aWol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whoa!
But then this is consistent apparently with his MO in running the bases under his command.

WHEN THE HECK IS HE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THAT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. One of the things that
impresses me about Clark is the way he dealt with this issue head on. Simple staightforward answer. Pretty hard to spion it but I'm sure the folks on Fox will try.

MzPip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. CLARK UNPLUGGED......TAKE A LISTEN
http://www.nhpr.org/view_summary/3/
interview/call-in from New Hampshire NPR 11/05/03 Wes Clark Interview (a must listen!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. oh boy
That could hurt his chances with cross-over votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBigBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I agree...
...creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. does he want to lose? Why would he bring that up?
you just can't put a positive spin on "abortion". It's a gross, bloody act. The word should be avoided at all costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, but the act should be decided by the woman.....
and that's the truth.

Clark is not a politician......so that's want he wanted to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. That radio interview!!!!!
Holy jeeeezus!

He gets it! he gets it!

The fall of the empire...the 2000 vote...the pounding on the door by a mob...redistricting...one party rule...

He said, "I don't know if everybody sees this..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. For Gods sake, the decision is between a woman and her doctor...
I LIKE a guy with the guts to speak hard truth. This man can CREAM George Bush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Is Futile Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Clark has really stepped in it now...
He`s not much of a politician, that much is clear. His mentions of the seven nations campaign and the risk of one party rule demonstrate that he knows what is at stake but he lacks the political knowhow to avoid the distraction issues that the GOP uses to maintain its iron grip on power.

Being a general and being a politican are two different things and, while he has a fairly good chance of winning an election against idiotboy, it is not at all clear that Clark has the background to make the transition to being a decent president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yikes is right....risky on the one hand, but honest...love it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC