Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

205 House members demand FCC media dereg vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:47 PM
Original message
205 House members demand FCC media dereg vote
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 06:48 PM by Armstead
(Press release)
http://bernie.house.gov/documents/releases/20031105175717.asp


For Immediate Release, 11/5/2003

Bipartisan Coalition of House Members Demand Vote on FCC Media Regulations


Washington, DC - Today, the House's most outspoken opponents of media consolidation took a major step forward in their fight against the FCC’s new media regulations. A bipartisan group of House members delivered a letter to Speaker of the House, J. Dennis Hastert (R-IL), signed by 205 House Members, including 11 Republicans demanding a House vote on the “resolution of disapproval” passed by the Senate on September 16th. This measure would nullify the Federal Communications Commission’s media ownership rule changes that (if allowed to stand) would permit dramatic economic consolidation in the media system. The Senate resolution was passed by a wide, bipartisan, 55-40 margin and was perceived as a fierce rebuke of Chairman Michael K. Powell’s FCC.

The letter to the Speaker, co-authored by Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Rep. Jim Leach (R-IA), Rep. David Price (D-NC), Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN), and Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA), has set a new highwater mark of support for media reform in the House. Under the rules of the CRA, the Senate resolution is not referred to a House committee, but sits at the Speaker’s desk until he brings it to the floor.

Rep. Sanders said, “There is simply no defense for allowing fewer and fewer massive corporations to control more and more of our media channels. If the FCC decision stands, we can expect lower standards, less attention to local interests and talent, and a general decline in the variety of public voices we hear, see, and read. We believe we have the votes to pass this resolution. This letter demonstrates that the conventional wisdom that the House would function as a roadblock for this popular measure has been utterly shattered. It’s a simple message here, give us a vote. Anything less would be an unconscionable betrayal of public opinion and the democratic process.”

Rep. Hinchey said, "Newspapers and radio and television stations are the main vehicles for public discussion of important issues. When a handful of corporations control the great majority of those media outlets, we lose a fundamental component of our democracy and cripple the public's ability to make informed decisions on matters that affect their everyday lives. I believe that the FCC rule changes lead us further down this treacherous path. Judging by the number of my colleagues who have signed this letter to Speaker Hastert asking for a vote on the Senate resolution, it's clear I'm not the only one. I earnestly hope the speaker will recognize the wishes of so many members of the House and give us the opportunity to vote on this vital issue."

Rep. Leach said, "American history, indeed American political philosophy, is rooted in the encouragement of disparate expression and competition of ideas. Diversity of views are stifled if diversity of information sources is concentrated."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wwagsthedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is 205 enough to force a vote?
What can tom delay do to keep a vote from occurring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If he ignores it
He's dead meat in Sugarland, TX.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not officially but with enough pressure...
especially since it includes a number of Repuglicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC