La_Serpiente
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:04 PM
Original message |
CalPundit, the blogger, has endorsed Clark for President |
|
I go to CalPundit everyday, and I like his analysis of the news. CalPundit endorsed Wes Clark a few days ago and today, he has stated why he has endorsed him. WHY I LIKE WES CLARK....Why did I decide to support Wes Clark for president? That's obviously a combination of what I think about Clark and what I think about the rest of the candidates, and I'll try to cover both sides here without making this too long. Let's start with Clark.
On a policy level, I usually look at three areas — but not in White Paper detail. I want to know general tone and direction, not the intricacies of how they're all going to finance their competing healthcare plans. So here's how Clark stacks up on policy:
Economic issues. After three years of George Bush, I have a low bar here: I just want a candidate whose ideas are not obviously insane. (Yes, that's what it's come to.) All of the candidates qualify on that score, although I think Clark is smart not to suggest repealing the middle class parts of the Bush tax cut and smart to emphasize some areas of spending cutbacks as well as tax increases. His position on free trade seems reasonable too, although I haven't seen a definitive statement about it from him.
Social issues. I think this is an area where Clark shines. His basic instincts are the ones that liberals look for — "I am pro-choice, I am pro-affirmative action, I am pro-environment, pro-health," as he famously said in the first debate — but at the same time he seems to understand that you can frame these issues as ones of basic fairness and security without gratuitously making them into culture war issues. I like that.
Foreign policy. This is probably the #1 issue in the 2004 election, and it's one where Clark's experience gives him credibility that the other candidates lack. It's true that most of the Democratic candidates say that they're committed to restoring our international relationships, but Clark is a guy who's actually fought a war with an international coalition and knows what a huge pain in the ass it is. When the other guys talk about alliances, I sometimes wonder if they really believe what they're saying, but when Clark talks about it I know that he believes what he's saying. What's more, I think he can convince the electorate that he's right about this and George Bush isn't.
Clark also does a pretty good balancing job. One of the fundamental problems with opposition is that you spend most of your time attacking the guy currently in office. That's fine, it's the way the game is played. But you also need to make it clear that you have a positive plan to make things better, and Clark does that pretty well. I think it could still use some work, but overall his ideas for fighting terrorism seem realistic, toughminded, and sensible.
Aside from policy stands, Clark has a lot of other things to recommend him too. His personality is attractive and levelheaded, he "oozes sincerity," he's a good speaker, and his character and judgment are sound.
In addition, he is also George Bush's worst nightmare. So not only do I think he would be a very good, liberal president at a policy level, but I also like his character and I think he's the most electable of the candidates. What more could I ask for? You can find the rest here: http://www.calpundit.com/
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And there is so much more...... Environmental issues are a great big plus for Clark, after I read his answers to the Conservation league of Voters. It was damn specific.
|
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Can you share a link, please.
You're a real gem!
|
UserJohnny1479
(9 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It really does not matter which Dem is endorsed |
|
Any of the Dems is a shoe-in and bush is out no matter what in 2004.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |