|
Edited on Sun Nov-09-03 05:52 PM by SilasSoule
Wingers on other boards I post on are increasingly trying to mainstream and justify the IRAQ fiasco for the procurement of oil.
For example when confronted by me and asked How Saddam Hussein threatened my freedom to post on internet message boards many of them respond that because Saddam controlled vast amounts of Oil that we could not control, that was a threat to my rights as a free American.
Example:
That a destabilized Middle East would, through an admittedly indirect chain of impact, eventually have an effect on your ability to sit in your heated or air-conditioned (depending on your location) home, sit down in your synthetic chair (made from petroleum products), power up your computer that a vehicle (yours or otherwise) powered by gasoline or diesel delivered to your door using electricity more likely than not generated by the burning of fossil fuels, and post that message? Now, you might be using hydroelectric power in your home, peanut oil to power your entirely plastic and oil-free car, and wear nothing but home killed and produced fabrics. If so, my hat is off to you. If not, then yes, he DID, in however minor a fashion, affect your right and ability to sit there and post.
Is this war about oil? In a large part, yes. Absolutely. News flash, folks - we need oil. Russian oil, South American oil, Domestic oil, and MIddle Eastern oil. And if Europe is the primary consumer of Middle Eastern oil, where will they turn when those wells either dry up or the flow is shut off? Think that might, just might, affect prices here? I dunno, but if I were a betting man.......
I'm seeing more and more wingnuts outright declare that all the natural resources on the planet are somehow justifiably ours. I just don't understand how we could have got this far out there this fast.
|