Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush* says Americans that are sent to Cuban POW camp no longer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:03 PM
Original message
Bush* says Americans that are sent to Cuban POW camp no longer
have constitutional rights. Says since they are no longer in America they no longer are covered by US Constitution even though they were taken from their homes here in America. Supreme Court is taking the case of two such Americans to rule on whether the Constitution is going to be upheld. American's are allowed the right to speedy trial and the right to an attorney. Bush* says no, that they are no longer in America so they no longer have the constitution to protect them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope he remembers this...
...on his upcoming visit to London...

After all, outside the US, he's entitled to neither Constitutional rights, nor rights as outlined in the Geneva convention, by his own "logic".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. What?!?
They had it when they were in the US. Why weren't they given it to them then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Easy one--make me a justice!
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Since obviously they are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and born or naturalized in this country, I would say the Constitution applies to them, as it does to all other citizens. This one should take ten minutes for the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Since the US is a legal leasee of Guantanamo
and long time leasee it would follow that the US is responsible for activities conducted on that property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. A leasehold estate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. He said they were prisoners of war.
However, doesn't that status change after the war is over? It seems to me, that the principal offenders should have trials like Nuremberg and the rest should be sent home. It seems to me that once there is no war, then those POW camps start looking more and more like concentration camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Under the Geneva Conventions, they can't be POWs
because only Congress can declare war, and wars can only be declared against another state.

The list of things for which McCokespoon and his cabal can be tried and imprisoned might actually be longer than the lists for most of the defendents at Nürnberg.

<cynical>Anyone want to make book on whether they will be?</cynical>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. No I don't have a link, just heard it on radio news but thread in LBN
on this very issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Link please...if true, unsurprising
The Buseviks don't like the Amerikan Subjects they rule an more than they do their new Iraqi subjects.

(but they get to steal from us both at the same time!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Another Repuke Attack On Non-White Americans!
how many of those at guantanamo are white??

why did timothy mcveigh have more rights than the brown skinned americans shipped off to cuba receive?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. will the supremes
uphold bush`s decree? the ruling will echo back to the magna charta in that a man is to be judged by a trial by his peers.if the supremes rule for bush then he can judge anyone in this country without review.this will place him in recent history along side stalin,hitler,and mao. great company he will keep in history. it will be the day democracy dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. that is the very definition of totalitarianism
intolerable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sworn To Uphold The Constitution, Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonoboy Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. is he totally loopy ??
does this guy just re-write the Constitution as he goes along. What an arrogant a*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Good
Now we can go back and discount all the absentee ballot votes from Americans that were outside the country during selection 2000! They obviously don't have the constitutional right to vote since they are outside the United States.

And 50% of the American people support this guy?!! WTFO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. What the F&%$
Facism...plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Great. Using that logic, if you need to get help in a foreign country,
don't call the US Embassy. The Constitution no longer
applies to you. Nor apparently does citizenship. GRRR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. If Gitmo isn't American soil
Than Cuba must be an ally of the US, cuz' I can't imaging that Cubans would let an enemy have a base on Cuban soil. Are people who visit Gitmo violating the Cuba travel ban when they visit Gitmo?

Better question, when do we start the treason trial for the BFEE (I want that witch Barbara HW Bush to go down hard)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC