Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Safire: Never Love a Stranger - What the hell is he talking about?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 12:30 AM
Original message
Poll question: Safire: Never Love a Stranger - What the hell is he talking about?
Edited on Wed Nov-12-03 12:31 AM by La_Serpiente
It looks like Safire is expecting Democrats to lose next year or something.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Never Love a Stranger
By WILLIAM SAFIRE

Published: November 12, 2003

WASHINGTON — Both power centers of the Democratic establishment — the Kennedy left and the Clinton middle — are frantic at the prospect of losing control of their party to Howard Dean. They fear a McGovernesque debacle that would hand the G.O.P. a super-majority in the Senate.

Clintonites were first to take the Dean threat seriously. As reported gleefully in this space (full disclosure: I'm rooting for Dean's candidacy in hopes of the debacle), the Clinton crowd surrounded ex-Gen. Wesley Clark with Clinton managers, spinmeisters, pollsters and fund-raisers and marched him into battle against Dean.

The Clinton political strategy was, as usual, astute: let Dick Gephardt slow Dean down in Iowa, then push Clark hard enough to upset Dean in New Hampshire, or at least attract enough of the isolationist vote from Dean to let John Kerry squeak through.

Of course, if the national economy had gone south, Hillary would have gone South with Clark on her ticket to take on an unemployment-ravaged Bush herself. But with the economy surging and Democrats robbed of their central issue, Hillary can wait till 2008. It is in the Clintons' interest for the 2004 Democratic nominee to lose respectably, not in a landslide, laying the basis for a 2008 comeback that would be impossible if Dean were in the White House.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This article is:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Safire is a rambling old fool with a combover for a cock
If I ever read him and Brooks back-to-back, I would never be able to read again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. a what 4 a what? ... 2 funny! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bwahaa-haahaa-haaaha......Bwaahaaa-haaahaa-haaa
"It is in the Clintons' interest for the 2004 Democratic nominee to lose respectably, not in a landslide, laying the basis for a 2008 comeback that would be impossible if Dean were in the White House."

It's Clinton's fault!:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes, more proof that Safire is insane
Safire, you are a fool. A dangerous fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beanball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Safire
go home the kingfish is calling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC