La_Serpiente
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-12-03 12:30 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Safire: Never Love a Stranger - What the hell is he talking about? |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-12-03 12:31 AM by La_Serpiente
It looks like Safire is expecting Democrats to lose next year or something. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Never Love a Stranger By WILLIAM SAFIRE
Published: November 12, 2003
WASHINGTON — Both power centers of the Democratic establishment — the Kennedy left and the Clinton middle — are frantic at the prospect of losing control of their party to Howard Dean. They fear a McGovernesque debacle that would hand the G.O.P. a super-majority in the Senate.
Clintonites were first to take the Dean threat seriously. As reported gleefully in this space (full disclosure: I'm rooting for Dean's candidacy in hopes of the debacle), the Clinton crowd surrounded ex-Gen. Wesley Clark with Clinton managers, spinmeisters, pollsters and fund-raisers and marched him into battle against Dean.
The Clinton political strategy was, as usual, astute: let Dick Gephardt slow Dean down in Iowa, then push Clark hard enough to upset Dean in New Hampshire, or at least attract enough of the isolationist vote from Dean to let John Kerry squeak through.
Of course, if the national economy had gone south, Hillary would have gone South with Clark on her ticket to take on an unemployment-ravaged Bush herself. But with the economy surging and Democrats robbed of their central issue, Hillary can wait till 2008. It is in the Clintons' interest for the 2004 Democratic nominee to lose respectably, not in a landslide, laying the basis for a 2008 comeback that would be impossible if Dean were in the White House. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This article is:
|
frank frankly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-12-03 12:32 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Safire is a rambling old fool with a combover for a cock |
|
If I ever read him and Brooks back-to-back, I would never be able to read again!
|
Isome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-12-03 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. a what 4 a what? ... 2 funny! n/t |
Zorra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-12-03 01:04 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Bwahaa-haahaa-haaaha......Bwaahaaa-haaahaa-haaa |
|
"It is in the Clintons' interest for the 2004 Democratic nominee to lose respectably, not in a landslide, laying the basis for a 2008 comeback that would be impossible if Dean were in the White House."
It's Clinton's fault!:beer:
|
frank frankly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-12-03 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. yes, more proof that Safire is insane |
|
Safire, you are a fool. A dangerous fool.
|
beanball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-12-03 05:42 AM
Response to Original message |
|
go home the kingfish is calling.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |